The Role of Theory in Behavior Analysis: A Response to Unfinished Business, Travis Thompson’s Review of Staddon's New Behaviorism (2nd edition)

被引:0
作者
J. E. R. Staddon
机构
[1] Duke University,
来源
The Psychological Record | 2021年 / 71卷
关键词
Skinner; Superstition; Frustration Effect; Choice; Timing; Unconscious Processes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Travis Thompson’s lengthy review of Staddon’s The New Behaviorism requires several corrections and extensions. This response discusses Staddon’s analysis of Herrnstein’s matching law and concludes that Thompson misinterprets a gentle critique as a paean. The response goes on to defend the utility of models and “internal states” (i.e., postulated processes that are not directly measurable) as “formal representation[s] of the data reduced to a minimal number of terms,” a position similar to one of B. F. Skinner’s statements. The response ends with a defense of Skinner’s empirical brilliance, but a critique of his sweeping societal prescriptions.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 479
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Baum WM(1974)On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 22 231-242
  • [2] Baum W(1982)Choice, changeover and travel Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 38 35-49
  • [3] Hinson JM(1983)Matching, maximizing and hill climbing Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 40 321-331
  • [4] Staddon JER(1972)The reinforcement-omission effect on fixed-interval schedules: Frustration or inhibition? Learning Motivation 3 138-147
  • [5] Kello JE(1988)The reflex reserve Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 50 319-331
  • [6] Killeen PR(1966)A note on Jost’s law and exponential forgetting Psychometrika 31 505-506
  • [7] Simon HA(1950)Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review 57 193-216
  • [8] Skinner BF(1956)A case history in scientific method American Psychologist 11 221-233
  • [9] Skinner BF(2002)Up close: Impersonal The Behavior Analyst 25 121-122
  • [10] Staddon J(1974)Temporal control, attention and memory Psychological Review 81 375-391