Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid

[1] Oh JH(2011)The current state of Total shoulder Arthroplasty Clin Shoulder Elbow 14 253-261

[2] Song BW(2002)Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study J Shoulder Elb Surg 11 351-359

[3] Boileau P(2014)Metal-backed Glenoid components have a higher rate of failure and fail by different modes in comparison with all-polyethylene components: a systematic review J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 1041-1047

[4] Avidor C(2010)Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 92 1410-1415

[5] Krishnan SG(2010)Total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented soft-metal-backed glenoid component J Shoulder Elb Surg 19 624-631

[6] Walch G(2016)Total shoulder arthroplasty with a secondgeneration tantalum trabecular metal-backed glenoid component Bone and Joint Journal 98B 75-80

[7] Kempf JF(2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 6 e1000097-716

[8] Mole D(2003)Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument ANZ J Surg 73 712-148

[9] Papadonikolakis A(2019)Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement Should Elb 11 140-321

[10] Matsen FA(2011)Bone presence between the central peg's radial fins of a partially cemented pegged all poly glenoid component suggest few radiolucencies J Shoulder Elb Surg 20 315-1223

[1] Oh JH(2011)The current state of Total shoulder Arthroplasty Clin Shoulder Elbow 14 253-261

[2] Song BW(2002)Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study J Shoulder Elb Surg 11 351-359

[3] Boileau P(2014)Metal-backed Glenoid components have a higher rate of failure and fail by different modes in comparison with all-polyethylene components: a systematic review J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 1041-1047

[4] Avidor C(2010)Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 92 1410-1415

[5] Krishnan SG(2010)Total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented soft-metal-backed glenoid component J Shoulder Elb Surg 19 624-631

[6] Walch G(2016)Total shoulder arthroplasty with a secondgeneration tantalum trabecular metal-backed glenoid component Bone and Joint Journal 98B 75-80

[7] Kempf JF(2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 6 e1000097-716

[8] Mole D(2003)Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument ANZ J Surg 73 712-148

[9] Papadonikolakis A(2019)Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement Should Elb 11 140-321

[10] Matsen FA(2011)Bone presence between the central peg's radial fins of a partially cemented pegged all poly glenoid component suggest few radiolucencies J Shoulder Elb Surg 20 315-1223