Prediction of limit pressure and pressuremeter modulus using artificial neural network analysis based on CPTU data

被引：1
作者：
Wu M. [1 ]
Congress S.S.C. [2 ]
Liu L. [1 ]
Cai G. [1 ]
Duan W. [1 ,3 ]
Chen R. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
[2] Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843-3136, TX
[3] College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan
来源：
Arabian Journal of Geosciences | 2021年 / 14卷 / 1期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词：
Artificial neural network; Limit pressure; Piezocone test; Pressuremeter modulus; Pressuremeter test;
D O I：
10.1007/s12517-020-06324-4
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Pressuremeter test (PMT) is conducted to obtain effective soil parameters such as limit pressure (PL) and pressuremeter modulus (Ep) that are frequently used in calculating foundation bearing capacity, settlement, and foundation behavior. However, the application of PMT in China was limited due to higher cost and time. There is a need for identifying a suitable method and establish models to predict reliable PL and Ep for interpreting or cross-checking soil parameters. Piezocone test (CPTU) offers an ideal test method to develop correlation models since it is widely adopted for geotechnical investigations in China. In this study, artificial neural networks (ANN) have been used to develop CPTU-PMT correlations. A total of 92 sets of sandy soil and 65 sets of clayey soil data from four testing sites were collected using CPTU and PMT. ANN was employed to develop 4 models, half of them considering effective overburden stress (σv0'), for predicting PL and Ep from CPTU data. The obtained ANN models were validated using the measured values of PL and Ep from pressuremeter tests and also the predicted values based on previous correlations. The comparison results show that PL and Ep values predicted by ANN models proposed in this study are more consistent with the measured values at testing sites. Additionally, foundation settlements were measured from a load test and compared with predictive settlements obtained using PL and Ep estimated by the proposed ANN correlation models. The results have shown that the CPTU results can be used to accurately predict PMT parameters and derive settlements. © 2021, Saudi Society for Geosciences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Standard test method for pre-bored pressuremeter testing in soils. ASTM D4719, (2000)
[2]  
Menard pressuremeter (G Type) operating instructions, (2006)
[3]  
Standard test method for electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils, ASTM D5778, (2000)
[4]  
Aladag C.H., Kayabasi A., Gokceoglu C., Estimation of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by various artificial neural network models, Neural Comput & Applic, 23, 2, pp. 333-339, (2013)
[5]  
Baguelin J.F., Jezequel J.F., Shields D.H., The pressuremeter and foundation engineering, (1978)
[6]  
Briaud J., Noubani A., Kilgore J., Tucker L., Correlation between pressuremeter data and other parameters. Civil Engineering Research Report, (1985)
[7]  
Briaud J., Spread footings in sand: load settlement curve approach, J Geotech Geoenviron, 133, pp. 905-920, (2007)
[8]  
Bozbey I., Togrol E., Correlation of standard penetration test and pressuremeter data: a case study from Istanbul, Turkey, B Eng Geol Environ Bulletin, 69, 4, pp. 505-515, (2010)
[9]  
Cheshomi A., Ghodrati M., Estimating Menard pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure from SPT in silty sand and silty clay soils. A case study in Mashhad, Iran, Geomech Geoeng, 10, 3, pp. 194-202, (2015)
[10]  
Clarke B.G., Pressuremeters in geotechnical design, (1995)
12345