Geochemical Characterisation of Seepage and Drainage Water Quality from Two Sulphide Mine Tailings Impoundments: Acid Mine Drainage versus Neutral Mine Drainage

被引:0
作者
P. M. Heikkinen
M. L. Räisänen
R. H. Johnson
机构
[1] Geological Survey of Finland,
[2] US Geological Survey,undefined
[3] Denver Federal Center,undefined
来源
Mine Water and the Environment | 2009年 / 28卷
关键词
Seepage waters; Drainage waters; Tailings; Sulphide mining; Heavy metals; As; Sulphate; Water quality; Environmental geochemistry; Geochemical modelling; Hitura; Luikonlahti; Finland;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Seepage water and drainage water geochemistry (pH, EC, O2, redox, alkalinity, dissolved cations and trace metals, major anions, total element concentrations) were studied at two active sulphide mine tailings impoundments in Finland (the Hitura Ni mine and Luikonlahti Cu mine/talc processing plant). The data were used to assess the factors influencing tailings seepage quality and to identify constraints for water treatment. Changes in seepage water quality after equilibration with atmospheric conditions were evaluated based on geochemical modelling. At Luikonlahti, annual and seasonal changes were also studied. Seepage quality was largely influenced by the tailings mineralogy, and the serpentine-rich, low sulphide Hitura tailings produced neutral mine drainage with high Ni. In contrast, drainage from the high sulphide, multi-metal tailings of Luikonlahti represented typical acid mine drainage with elevated contents of Zn, Ni, Cu, and Co. Other factors affecting the seepage quality included weathering of the tailings along the seepage flow path, process water input, local hydrological settings, and structural changes in the tailings impoundment. Geochemical modelling showed that pH increased and some heavy metals were adsorbed to Fe precipitates after net alkaline waters equilibrated with the atmosphere. In the net acidic waters, pH decreased and no adsorption occurred. A combination of aerobic and anaerobic treatments is proposed for Hitura seepages to decrease the sulphate and metal loading. For Luikonlahti, prolonged monitoring of the seepage quality is suggested instead of treatment, since the water quality is still adjusting to recent modifications to the tailings impoundment.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 49
页数:19
相关论文
共 111 条
[11]  
Herbert RB(2008)Mineralogical and geochemical alteration of Hitura sulphide mine tailings with emphasis on nickel mobility and retention J Geochem Explor 97 1-20
[12]  
Ptacek CJ(1994)Metal transport in ground water contaminated by acid mine drainage Nordic Hydrol 25 193-212
[13]  
Blowes DW(2001)Geochemical investigations of sulfide-bearing tailings at Kristineberg, northern Sweden, a few years after remediation Sci Total Environ 273 111-133
[14]  
Jambor JL(1970)Contribution to the geology and geochemistry of the Outokumpu region Bull Geol Soc Finl 42 57-88
[15]  
Cravotta CA(1985)Geology and nickel-copper ores of the Nivala area Geol Surv Finl Bull 333 211-228
[16]  
Cravotta CA(2000)The hydrogeochemistry of the Nickel Rim mine tailings impoundment, Sudbury, Ontario J Contam Hydrol 41 49-80
[17]  
Eskelinen E(1995)Effects of colloids on metal transport in a river receiving acid mine drainage, upper Arkansas River, Colorado, USA Appl Geochem 10 285-306
[18]  
Huopaniemi P(2005)Net alkalinity and net acidity 2: practical considerations Appl Geochem 20 1941-1964
[19]  
Tyni M(2000)Toxicity of manganese to Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 38 298-304
[20]  
Fuge R(2005) and J Geochem Explor 85 119-137