Geochemical Characterisation of Seepage and Drainage Water Quality from Two Sulphide Mine Tailings Impoundments: Acid Mine Drainage versus Neutral Mine Drainage

被引:0
作者
P. M. Heikkinen
M. L. Räisänen
R. H. Johnson
机构
[1] Geological Survey of Finland,
[2] US Geological Survey,undefined
[3] Denver Federal Center,undefined
来源
Mine Water and the Environment | 2009年 / 28卷
关键词
Seepage waters; Drainage waters; Tailings; Sulphide mining; Heavy metals; As; Sulphate; Water quality; Environmental geochemistry; Geochemical modelling; Hitura; Luikonlahti; Finland;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Seepage water and drainage water geochemistry (pH, EC, O2, redox, alkalinity, dissolved cations and trace metals, major anions, total element concentrations) were studied at two active sulphide mine tailings impoundments in Finland (the Hitura Ni mine and Luikonlahti Cu mine/talc processing plant). The data were used to assess the factors influencing tailings seepage quality and to identify constraints for water treatment. Changes in seepage water quality after equilibration with atmospheric conditions were evaluated based on geochemical modelling. At Luikonlahti, annual and seasonal changes were also studied. Seepage quality was largely influenced by the tailings mineralogy, and the serpentine-rich, low sulphide Hitura tailings produced neutral mine drainage with high Ni. In contrast, drainage from the high sulphide, multi-metal tailings of Luikonlahti represented typical acid mine drainage with elevated contents of Zn, Ni, Cu, and Co. Other factors affecting the seepage quality included weathering of the tailings along the seepage flow path, process water input, local hydrological settings, and structural changes in the tailings impoundment. Geochemical modelling showed that pH increased and some heavy metals were adsorbed to Fe precipitates after net alkaline waters equilibrated with the atmosphere. In the net acidic waters, pH decreased and no adsorption occurred. A combination of aerobic and anaerobic treatments is proposed for Hitura seepages to decrease the sulphate and metal loading. For Luikonlahti, prolonged monitoring of the seepage quality is suggested instead of treatment, since the water quality is still adjusting to recent modifications to the tailings impoundment.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 49
页数:19
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Bain JG(2000)Modelling of sulfide oxidation with reactive transport at a mine drainage site J Contam Hydrol 41 23-47
[2]  
Blowes DW(2008)Iron and manganese removal in wetland treatment systems: rates, processes and implications for management Sci Total Environ 394 1-18
[3]  
Robertson WD(1999)Geochemistry of a permeable reactive barrier for metals and acid mine drainage Environ Sci Technol 33 2783-2799
[4]  
Frind EO(1990)The pore-water geochemistry and the mineralogy of the vadose zone of sulfide tailings, Waite Amulet, Quebec, Canada Appl Geochem 5 327-346
[5]  
Batty L(2007)Passive aerobic treatment of net-alkaline, iron-laden drainage from a flooded underground anthracite mine, Pennsylvania, USA Mine Water Environ 26 128-149
[6]  
Hooley D(2008)Dissolved metals and associated constituents in abandoned coal-mine discharges, Pennsylvania, USA. Part 2: geochemical controls on constituent concentrations Appl Geochem 23 203-226
[7]  
Younger P(1983)Myllykoski Oy:n Luikonlahden kuparikaivos 1968–1983 Vuoriteollisuus 41 94-98
[8]  
Benner SG(1991)The influence of acidic mine and spoil drainage on water quality in the mid-Wales area Environ Geochem Health 13 70-75
[9]  
Blowes DW(1996)A review of passive systems for the treatment of acid mine drainage Miner Eng 9 23-42
[10]  
Gould WD(2002)Ground water and surface water contamination in the area of the Hitura nickel mine, Western Finland Environ Geol 42 313-329