The relevance of ecological and economic policies for sustainable development

被引：8
作者：
Hellstrand S. [1 ]
Skånberg K. [2 ]
Drake L. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kil SE-665 92
[2] Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå
[3] Swedish Chemicals Agency, Sundbyberg
来源：
Environment, Development and Sustainability | 2009年 / 11卷 / 4期
关键词：
Emergy; Exergy; Integrated assessment; Multi-disciplinary; Resource concepts; Sustainable development; Value measures;
D O I：
10.1007/s10668-008-9156-1
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
A sustainable development can be understood as social and economic development within ecological sustainability limits. The operationalisation of a sustainable development presupposes integration of resource concepts covering relevant disciplines and systems levels. In this paper descriptive domains within physical resource theory (PRT), nutrition theory (NT), economic theory (ET) and emergy theory (EmT) are joined in what we call a "sustainability map." The sustainability map represents a conceptual model of the economic production system in its ecological and social contexts. It is a contribution within the field integrated assessment. The relevance domain of each resource concept is analysed by comparison with the sustainability map. It is concluded that resource concepts that well supports a sustainable development should recognise the process restrictions that defines ecological, economic and social sustainability limits; thus recognise and in a relevant way treat threshold-and resilience phenomena; and capture the use-value of resources for human well-being. We suggest that the integration of NT, ET and EmT may contribute, while we find the value of PRT limited, as physics, thus PRT, is indifferent to life as a system characteristic, while life of microbes, plants, animals and humans is central in the sustainability context. The paper contributes to a theoretical foundation supporting a bridging of the implementation gap of a sustainable development, e.g. through its proposal of how to develop more accurate natural resource concepts. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码：853 / 870
页数：17
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Brown M.T., Ulgiati S., Emergy evaluation of the biosphere and natural capital, Ambio, 28, 6, pp. 486-493, (1999)
  • [2] Cleveland C.J., Kaufmann R.K., Stern D.I., Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy, Ecological Economics, 32, 2, pp. 301-317, (2000)
  • [3] Common M., Perrings C., Towards an ecological economics of sustainability, Ecological Economics, 6, 1, pp. 7-34, (1992)
  • [4] Costanza R., Three general policies to achieve sustainability, Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability, pp. 392-407, (1994)
  • [5] Costanza R., Perrings C., A flexible assurance bonding system for improved environmental management, Ecological Economics, 2, 1, pp. 57-75, (1990)
  • [6] Daly H.E., Toward some operational principles of sustainable development, Ecological Economics, 2, pp. 1-6, (1990)
  • [7] Daly H.E., Cobb J.B., For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and A Sustainable Future, (1989)
  • [8] Drake L., Hellstrand S., The Economics of the Swedish Policy to Reduce Cadmium in Fertilisers, (1998)
  • [9] Giampietro M., Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Agroecosystems, (2003)
  • [10] Hall C.A.S., Maximum Power: The Ideas and Applications of H. T. Odum, (1995)
123456