A private universal voucher program’s effects on traditional public schools

被引:0
作者
Gray N.L. [1 ]
Merrifield J.D. [2 ]
Adzima K.A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Young Harris College, Young Harris, 30582, GA
[2] COB - UTSA DT Campus, 501 West Durango Blvd., San Antonio, 78207, TX
[3] Sam and Irene Black School of Business, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, 5101 Jordan Road, Erie, 16563, PA
关键词
K-12; education; School choice; Voucher;
D O I
10.1007/s12197-014-9309-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
K-12 education reformers have often cited increases in spending with little noticeable gain in test scores, coupled with the fact that American students lag behind their foreign peers on standardized tests, as a major policy problem. School choice, specifically voucher programs, have emerged as a possible solution to the K-12 education woes. This article focuses on what is commonly referred to as the “systemic effects” of a private voucher program in the Edgewood Independent School District (EISD) in San Antonio, Texas. Using carefully chosen control districts and a robust econometric analysis, we conclude that the CEO Horizon Scholarship Program had small, positive effects on the traditional public schools of EISD. The rate of change growth, however, does slow as the voucher program nears the end of its term indicating that traditional public school participants need to believe that these programs are long term. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 344
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bettinger E., The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools, Econ Educ Rev, 24, 2, (2005)
[2]  
Bifulco R., Ladd H.F., The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: evidence from North Carolina, Educ Financ Policy, 1, 1, (2006)
[3]  
Bohte J., Examining the impact of charter schools on performance in traditional public schools, Policy Stud J, 32, 4, (2004)
[4]  
Booker K., Gilpatric S., Gronberg T., Jansen D., The effect of charter schools on traditional public school students in Texas: are children who stay behind left behind?, J Urban Econ, 64, (2008)
[5]  
Bryk A.S., Raudenbush S.W., Bock R.D., Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: A three-level hierarchical linear model, Multilevel statistical methods in educational research, (1987)
[6]  
Buddin R., Zimmer R., Student achievement in charter schools: a complex pictures, J Policy Anal Manag, 24, 2, pp. 351-371, (2005)
[7]  
Carr M., Ritter G., Measuring the competitive effect of charter schools on student achievement in Ohio’s traditional public schools (Research Publication No. 146), National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, (2007)
[8]  
Diamond J.W., Should Texas adopt a school choice program? An evaluation of the Horizon scholarship program in San Antonio, (2007)
[9]  
Gray N.L., The effects of the Ohio charter school policy on traditional public school achievement, Cato J, 32, 3, pp. 557-579, (2012)
[10]  
Greene J.P., Hall D., The CEO horizon scholarship program: a case study of school vouchers in the Edgewood independent school district, San Antonio, (2001)