Numerical simulation of helicon waves current drive in the HL-2M tokamak for the steady-state scenario

被引:0
作者
Hong Bo Liu
Xin Xia Li
Zheng Yao Xiao
Ding Zong Zhang
Ai Ping Sun
机构
[1] University of South China,Department of Nuclear Physics
[2] Hengyang Normal University,School of Physics and Electronic Engineering
[3] Southwestern Institute of Physics,undefined
来源
Journal of the Korean Physical Society | 2021年 / 79卷
关键词
Tokamak; HL-2M; Helicon wave; Current drive;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The helicon wave heating and current drive in the HL-2M tokamak for the steady-state scenario is studied numerically. Based on the theory of fast wave current drive proposed by Chiu, we analyze the characteristics of helicon waves damping for the HL-2M tokamak. For wave frequencies larger than 420 MHz, strong wave damping occurs, and electron Landau damping is dominant. Moreover, a strong wave absorption region associated with the dimensionless parameters βe\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta _{e}$$\end{document} and ξe\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\xi _{e}$$\end{document} that depend on the wave frequency is obtained. The helicon wave propagation and current drive are simulated using the GENRAY/CQL3D code. The results show that an off-axis current drive with profiles peak at ρ∼0.4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho \sim 0.4$$\end{document} can be generally received at a wave frequency f∼500\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$f\sim 500$$\end{document} MHz and the launched parallel refractive index n//=3.8\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n_{//}=3.8$$\end{document} and that the current drive efficiency reaches up to ∼\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim$$\end{document}140 kA/MW. A scan of n//\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n_{//}$$\end{document} showed that both the current drive profile peak and the generated current could be adjusted by changing the launched n//\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n_{//}$$\end{document}. Finally, a feasible scheme for the helicon wave off-axis current drive in the HL-2M tokamak is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1140
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Fisch NJ(1980)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 720-undefined
[2]  
Boozer AH(2011)undefined Nucl. Fusion 51 083019-undefined
[3]  
Chan VS(1997)undefined Fusion Eng. Des. 38 27-undefined
[4]  
Jardin SC(2015)undefined Phys. Plasmas 22 090901-undefined
[5]  
Pinsker RI(2013)undefined Plasma Phys. Rep. 39 95-undefined
[6]  
Vdovin VL(1995)undefined Nucl. Fusion 35 773-undefined
[7]  
Petty CC(1987)undefined Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 175-undefined
[8]  
Fisch NJ(2015)undefined AIP Conf. Proc. 1689 080011-undefined
[9]  
Lau C(2018)undefined Nucl. Fusion 58 066004-undefined
[10]  
Lau C(1994)undefined Nucl. Fusion 34 871-undefined