Attitudes, practices and perspectives on imaging strategies in prostate cancer: a national cross-sectional survey involving expert radiation oncologists on behalf of AIRO (Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology) GU group

被引:0
作者
Raffaella Lucchini
Giulio Francolini
Fabio Matrone
Giorgia Timon
Ciro Franzese
Giulia Marvaso
Paolo Borghetti
Luca Nicosia
Luca Eolo Trodella
Annamaria Vinciguerra
Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
Stefano Arcangeli
机构
[1] School of Medicine and Surgery—University of Milan Bicocca,Department of Radiation Oncology
[2] University of Florence,Radiotherapy Department
[3] Oncologico di Aviano CRO-IRCCS,Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento
[4] Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale—IRCCS di Reggio Emilia,Radioterapia Oncologica
[5] Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS,Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department
[6] IEO,Division of Radiation Oncology
[7] European Institute of Oncology IRCCS,Radiation Oncology Department
[8] University and Spedali Civili of Brescia,Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center
[9] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital,Radiation Oncology
[10] Campus Bio-Medico University,Radiation Oncology
[11] “G. D’Annunzio” University,Department of Oncology and Hemato
[12] University of Milan,Oncology
来源
Medical Oncology | 2022年 / 39卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Imaging; MRI; PSMA PET/CT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although high sensitive imaging modalities such as MRI and PSMA PET/CT are becoming available for prostate cancer (PCa), the clinical benefit of an earlier detection of subclinical disease remains yet undetermined. Given these uncertainties, univocal recommendations are often lacking. The present survey was therefore developed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) to collect the opinion of expert radiation oncologists and delineate a representation of current clinical practice in our country. A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in Italy by administering an anonymous questionnaire to experienced radiation oncologists, representative of the genitourinary (GU) tumor board at their Institution, using the cloud-based platform SurveyMonkey®. For each question, a consensus was achieved when ≥ 75% of the responders agreed on the same response. Thirty nine AIRO members from different Italian centers who were deemed experts in GU field accessed the proposed survey and completed all sections. Explored topics included staging of organ-confined disease, management of biochemical and local recurrence, imaging in the metastatic setting, imaging following metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), and future considerations. Response rate for single item of the questionnaire ranged between 51.2% and 100%. Expert GU AIRO members agree that advanced molecular and functional imaging are expanding their role in local and distant staging of PCa, as well as in the oncologic management and in the assessment of treatment response. However, many controversial issues still exist on the best timing for a diagnostic evaluation and the most appropriate imaging to aim at this purpose.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Murphy DG(2017)‘‘Gotta Catch ’em All’’, or Do we? Pokemet approach to metastatic prostate cancer Eur Urol 72 1-3
[2]  
Sweeney CJ(2020)Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Urol 77 403-417
[3]  
Tombal B(2017)Seduction by sensitivity: reality, illusion, or delusion? The challenge of assessing outcomes after PSMA imaging selection of patients for treatment J Nucl Med 58 1969-1971
[4]  
Perera M(2021)EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent Eur Urol 79 243-262
[5]  
Papa N(2020)Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multi-centre study Lancet 75 967-987
[6]  
Roberts M(2019)Prognostic value of biochemical recurrence following treatment with curative intent for prostate cancer a systematic review Eur Urol 4 356-357
[7]  
Hicks RJ(2021)Contemporary imaging technologies for men with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy and before early salvage irradiation: where do we stand? Eur Urol Oncol 397 1895-1904
[8]  
Murphy DG(2021)Postoperative radiotherapy after upfront radical prostatectomy: debated issues at a turning point-a survey exploring management trends on behalf of AIRO (Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology) Clin Transl Oncol 118 660-78
[9]  
Williams SG(2021)F-fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging versus conventional imaging alone to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer (EMPIRE-1): a single centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial Lancet 19 134-143
[10]  
Mottet N(2013)AIRO young and AIRO prostate cancer working group. The PROCAINA (PROstate CAncer INdication Attitudes) project (Part I): a survey among Italian radiation oncologists on postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer Radiol Med 79 263-282