Management of Cleft Maxillary Hypoplasia with Anterior Maxillary Distraction: Our Experience

被引:6
作者
Chacko T. [1 ]
Vinod S. [2 ]
Mani V. [2 ]
George A. [2 ]
Sivaprasad K.K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Kerala
[2] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Kerala
关键词
Anterior maxillary distraction; Cleft lip and palate; Hyrax;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-013-0521-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Maxillary hypoplasia is a common developmental problem in cleft lip and palate deformities. Since 1970s these deformities have traditionally been corrected by means of orthognathic surgery. Management of skeletal deformities in the maxillofacial region has been an important challenge for maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists. Distraction osteogenesis is a surgical technique that uses body’s own repairing mechanisms for optimal reconstruction of the tissues. We present four cases of anterior maxillary distraction osteogenesis with tooth borne distraction device-Hyrax, which were analyzed retrospectively for the efficacy of the tooth borne device-Hyrax and skeletal stability of distracted anterior maxillary segment. © 2013, Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 555
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Hirano A., Suzuki H., Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate, Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 38, (2001)
  • [2] Guyette T.W., Polley J.W., Figueroa A., Et al., Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis, Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 38, (2001)
  • [3] Perott D.H., Berger R., Vargeric K., Et al., Use of skeletal distraction device to widen the mandible: a case report, J Oral Maxillofacial Surg, 51, (1993)
  • [4] Chin M., Toth B.A., Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: review of five cases, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 54, pp. 45-53, (1996)
  • [5] Abbott L.C., The operative lengthening of the tibia and fibula, J Bone Joint Surg, 9, pp. 128-139, (1927)
  • [6] Hollier L.H., Kim J.H., Grayson B., McCarthy J.G., Mandibular growth after distraction in patients under 48 months of age, Plast Reconstr Surg, 103, pp. 1361-1370, (1999)
  • [7] Ilizarov G.A., Basic principles of transosseous compression and distraction osteosynthesis, Ortop Travmatol Protez, 32, pp. 7-9, (1971)
  • [8] Karp N.S., McCarthy J.G., Schrieber J.S., Et al., Membranous bone lengthening: a serial histologic study, Ann Plast Surg, 29, pp. 2-7, (1992)
  • [9] Cohen S.R., Craniofacial distraction with a modular internal distraction system: evolution of design and surgical techniques, Plast Reconstr Surg, 103, pp. 1596-1607, (1999)
  • [10] Block M.S., Brister G.D., Use of distraction osteogenesis for maxillary advancement: preliminary results, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, pp. 282-286, (1994)