Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors

被引:0
作者
Matija Milosevic
Yohei Masugi
Hiroki Obata
Atsushi Sasaki
Milos R. Popovic
Kimitaka Nakazawa
机构
[1] The University of Tokyo,Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
[2] Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,Institute of Sports Medicine and Science
[3] Tokyo International University,Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
[4] Kyushu Institute of Technology,Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering
[5] University of Toronto,Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory
[6] Toronto Rehabilitation Institute -University Health Network,undefined
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2019年 / 237卷
关键词
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Spinal reflex; Neuroplasticity; Soleus; Rehabilitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of lower limbs elicits muscle contractions through the activation of efferent fibers and concomitant recruitment of afferent fibers, which can modulate excitability of the central nervous system. However, neural mechanisms of NMES and how unilateral stimulation of the soleus affects spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles bilaterally remains unknown. Twelve able-bodied participants were recruited, and spinal reflex excitability changes were tested after four interventions, each applied for 60 s, on the right plantar flexors: (1) motor-level NMES; (2) sensory-level NMES; (3) voluntary contraction; (4) rest. Spinal reflexes were elicited using single-pulse transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation applied on the lumbar level of the spinal cord to evoke bilateral responses in multiple lower limb muscles, while maximum motor response (Mmax) was tested in the soleus by stimulating the posterior tibial nerve. Spinal reflexes and Mmax before each intervention were compared to immediately after and every 5 min subsequently, for 15 min. Results showed that motor-level NMES inhibited spinal reflexes of the soleus and other studied muscles of the ipsilateral leg, but not the contralateral leg (except vastus medialis) for 15 min, while not affecting soleus muscle properties (Mmax). Voluntary contraction effect lasted less than 5 min, while sensory-level NMES and rest did not produce an effect. Short-term spinal reflex excitability was likely affected because antidromic impulses during motor-level NMES coincided in the spinal cord with afferent inputs to induce spinal neuroplasticity, whereas afferent input alone did not produce short-term effects. Such activation of muscles with NMES could reduce spasticity in individuals with neurological impairments.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]  
Barbeau H(2000)Posture-related changes in heteronymous recurrent inhibition from quadriceps to ankle muscles in humans Exp Brain Res 130 345-361
[2]  
Marchand-Pauvert V(2011)Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley Eur J Appl Physiol 111 2409-2426
[3]  
Meunier S(2006)Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms J Appl Physiol 101 1514-1522
[4]  
Nicolas G(2007)Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans J Physiol 582 1125-1139
[5]  
Pierrot-Deseilligny E(1999)Amplitude of the maximum motor response ( Exp Brain Res 124 265-270
[6]  
Bergquist AJ(1995)) in human muscles typically decreases during the course of an experiment Ann Neurol 37 574-582
[7]  
Clair JM(2013)Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med 62 151-158
[8]  
Lagerquist O(2010)Short-term effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation during resistance training on the spinal reflex circuit Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 168-177
[9]  
Mang CS(2016)Does functional electrical stimulation for foot drop strengthen corticospinal connections? Neural Plast 2016 4192718-494
[10]  
Okuma Y(1949)The neural correlates of long-term carryover following functional electrical stimulation for stroke Ann Psychol 51 493-211