Multi-level Stakeholder Influence Mapping: Visualizing Power Relations Across Actor Levels in Nepal’s Agricultural Climate Change Adaptation Regime

被引:0
|
作者
Chase A. Sova
Ariella Helfgott
Abrar S. Chaudhury
David Matthews
Thomas F. Thornton
Sonja J. Vermeulen
机构
[1] CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change,Environmental Change Institute (ECI)
[2] Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS),undefined
[3] International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT),undefined
[4] University of Oxford,undefined
[5] University of Adelaide,undefined
来源
Systemic Practice and Action Research | 2015年 / 28卷
关键词
Climate change; Adaptation; Agriculture; Nepal; Power; Influence; Mapping;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Where power lies and how it is conceived in studies of governance and institutions is often not discussed. This is due to the ubiquitous nature of the topic. Power is shaped by a variety of institutional factors, including the architecture of governing structures, questions of scale and level, and access to key resources including knowledge and capital, among other factors. To date, there are relatively few tools available that allow policy makers, researchers, and development practitioners to render these power dynamics explicit and thus take steps to mitigate the potentially deleterious effects of power orientations. This paper proposes a methodology, multi-level stakeholder influence mapping (MSIM), for elucidating power dynamics between actors in complex system regimes. MSIM departs from existing power mapping techniques in that it relies on individual interviews conducted across multiple actor levels and utilizes a participatory mapping process for shared system boundary critique. MSIM was piloted in Nepal’s agricultural climate change adaptation regime with actors from the central, regional, and local operational levels. The results suggest that without proper consideration of the role of power in agricultural adaptation regimes, the resulting interventions will likely be insufficient in catalyzing adaptation pathways and moderating the negative impacts of climate change. Furthermore, power analyses produced from the perspective of a single actor level or respondent type can risk sub optimization of adaptation outcomes and can misdirect the lobbying efforts of those agencies utilizing mapping outputs.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 409
页数:26
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Multi-level Stakeholder Influence Mapping: Visualizing Power Relations Across Actor Levels in Nepal's Agricultural Climate Change Adaptation Regime
    Sova, Chase A.
    Helfgott, Ariella
    Chaudhury, Abrar S.
    Matthews, David
    Thornton, Thomas F.
    Vermeulen, Sonja J.
    SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2015, 28 (04) : 383 - 409
  • [2] Power and influence mapping in Ghana's agricultural adaptation policy regime
    Sova, Chase A.
    Thornton, Thomas F.
    Zougmore, Robert
    Helfgott, Ariella
    Chaudhury, Abrar S.
    CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 9 (05) : 399 - 414
  • [3] Multi-level learning in the governance of adaptation to climate change: the case of Bolivia's water sector
    Gonzales-Iwanciw, Javier
    Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia
    Dewulf, Art
    CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 13 (05) : 399 - 413
  • [4] Can Adaptation to Climate Change at All Be Mainstreamed in Complex Multi-level Governance Systems? A Case Study of Forest-Relevant Policies at the EU and Swedish Levels
    Keskitalo, E. Carina H.
    Pettersson, Maria
    IMPLEMENTING CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN CITIES AND COMMUNITIES: INTEGRATING STRATEGIES AND EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES, 2016, : 53 - 74