S3 guidelines on breast cancer: locoregional treatment

被引:0
作者
Fehm T. [1 ]
Wöckel A. [2 ]
Kühn T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Universitätsfrauenklinik Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 4, Düsseldorf
[2] Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Würzburg
[3] Frauenklinik Esslingen, Esslingen
来源
Der Gynäkologe | 2018年 / 51卷 / 7期
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Neoadjuvant therapy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Resection margins; Sentinel lymph node biopsy;
D O I
10.1007/s00129-018-4264-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the updated S3 guidelines on “Diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancer”, locoregional therapy has been significantly revised due to new clinical study data. The focus of the updated version is on de-escalation of surgery on the breast and axilla in early stage breast cancer. The new definition of adequate resection margins requires “no ink on tumor” which will minimize the rate of re-excisions. Also, prophylactic mastectomy of the contralateral breast in patients without BRCA status or familial high-risk situation is still not indicated. Axillary lymph node dissection can be safely avoided in patients with 1–2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes who undergo breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast radiotherapy. Major revisions have been made on the recommendations regarding a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) in patients with primary systemic therapy (PST). The SNLB after PST is now defined as the standard treatment in patients with initially clinically negative lymph nodes; however, a complete axillary dissection must be performed in initially lymph node positive patients regardless of the response to PST. Overall, the new recommendations of the S3 guidelines enable in many cases a de-escalation of surgical treatment and thus a reduction of morbidity. © 2018, Springer Verlag. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Houssami N., Et al., The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy: a meta-analysis, Ann Surg Oncol, 21, 3, pp. 717-730, (2014)
[2]  
Buchholz T.A., Et al., Margins for breast conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline, J Clin Oncol, 32, 14, pp. 1502-1506, (2014)
[3]  
Jones H.A., Et al., Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial, J Clin Oncol, 27, 39, pp. 4939-4947, (2009)
[4]  
Committee N.C.E., Diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with breast cancer: national clinical guideline no 7, (2015)
[5]  
Gentilini O., Et al., Conservative surgery in patients with multifocal/multicentric breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 113, 3, pp. 577-583, (2009)
[6]  
Lanitis S., Et al., Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy versus non skin-skin-sparing mastekctomy for breast cancer: a metaanalysis of observational studies, Ann Surg, 251, 4, pp. 632-639, (2010)
[7]  
Piper M., Et al., Total skin sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications, Ann Plast Surg, 70, 4, pp. 435-437, (2013)
[8]  
Lyman G.H., Et al., Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update, J Clin Oncol, 32, 13, pp. 1365-1383, (2014)
[9]  
Giuliano A.E., Et al., Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel lymph node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA, 305, 6, pp. 569-575, (2011)
[10]  
Gartlehner G., Et al., Vergleichende Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von alleiniger Sentinel-Lymphknoten-Biopsie oder kompletter Axilladissektion bei Sentinel-positivem Mammakarzinom: Systematische Übersichtsarbeit, (2011)