Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis

被引：0
作者：
Susan Armijo-Olivo
Jorge Fuentes
Maria Ospina
Humam Saltaji
Lisa Hartling
机构：
[1] University of Alberta,Postdoctoral Fellow, CLEAR (Connecting Leadership and Research) Outcomes Research Program
[2] 5-115A Edmonton Clinic Health Academy (ECHA),Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy
[3] University of Alberta,Department of Physical Therapy
[4] Catholic University of Maule,School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
[5] School of Public Health,Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
[6] University of Alberta,undefined
[7] Institute of Health Economics,undefined
[8] University of Alberta,undefined
[9] University of Alberta,undefined
来源：
BMC Medical Research Methodology | / 13卷
关键词：
Bias; Methodological quality; Quality assessment; Critical appraisal; Risk of bias; Quality of reporting;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 273 条
[1]  
Verhagen AP(2001)The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 54 651-654
[2]  
de Vet HC(2001)Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials BMJ 323 42-46
[3]  
de Bie RA(2011)The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ 343 d5928-175
[4]  
Boers M(2008)Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review Phys Ther 88 156-73
[5]  
van den Brandt PA(1995)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists Control Clin Trials 16 62-1752
[6]  
Juni P(2002)Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back pain Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 1745-1256
[7]  
Altman DG(2006)Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned J Clin Epidemiol 59 1249-18
[8]  
Egger M(2012)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and the Effectve Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research J Eval Clin Pract 18 12-857
[9]  
Higgins JPT(2007)Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials Int J Epidemiol 36 847-605
[10]  
Altman DG(2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: Meta-epidemiological study BMJ 336 601-613
12345678910