Opportunity cost neglect: a meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Allegra Maguire
Emil Persson
Gustav Tinghög
机构
[1] Linköping University,JEDILAB, Division of Economics, Department of Management and Engineering
[2] Linköping University,Department of Health, Medical and Caring Sciences, The National Center for Priority Setting in Health Care
来源
Journal of the Economic Science Association | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
Opportunity cost; Opportunity cost neglect; Behavioural economics; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; C9; D10; D91;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a seminal paper, Frederick et al. (J Consum Res 36:553–561, 2009) showed that people’s willingness to purchase a consumer good declined dramatically when opportunity costs were made more salient (Cohen’s d = 0.45–0.85). This finding suggests that people normally do not pay sufficient attention to opportunity costs and as a result make poorer and less efficient decisions, both in private and public domains. To critically assess the strength of opportunity cost neglect, we carried out a systematic review and a meta-analysis including published and non-published experimental work. In total, 39 experimental studies were included in the meta-analysis (N = 14,005). The analysis shows a robust significant effect (Cohen’s d = 0.22; p < 0.001) of opportunity cost neglect across different domains, albeit the effect is considerably smaller than what was originally estimated by Frederick et al. (2009). Our findings highlight the importance of meta-analyses and replications of initial findings.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 192
页数:16
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Aharoni E(2018)Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments Behavioral Sciences & the Law 37 38-60
  • [2] Kleider-Offutt HM(2020)The price of justice: Cost neglect increases criminal punishment recommendations Legal and Criminological Psychology 25 47-61
  • [3] Brosnan SF(2013)Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14 365-376
  • [4] Watzek J(2019)Are the benefits of new health services greater than their opportunity costs? Australian Health Review 43 508-510
  • [5] Aharoni E(2020)Moral preferences in helping dilemmas expressed by matching and forced choice Judgment and Decision Making 15 452-475
  • [6] Kleider-Offutt HM(1997)Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14 283-300
  • [7] Brosnan SF(2009)Opportunity cost neglect Journal of Consumer Research 36 553-561
  • [8] Button K(2016)Opportunity cost neglect attenuates the effect of choices on preferences Psychological Science 27 103-113
  • [9] Ioannidis J(2007)An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings Clinical Trials 4 245-253
  • [10] Mokrysz C(1993)Focusing in reasoning and decision making Cognition 49 37-66