Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells for spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Wei-can Chen
Wei-feng Liu
Yu-yan Bai
Ying-ying Zhou
Yan Zhang
Cong-mei Wang
Shu Lin
He-fan He
机构
[1] The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Department of Anesthesiology
[2] The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Centre of Neurological and Metabolic Research
[3] Garvan Institute of Medical Research,Diabetes and Metabolism Division
来源
Journal of Translational Medicine | / 19卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe traumatic disease of the central nervous system, with a global prevalence of 236–4187 per million people. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in treating patients with SCI as well as the optimal source and transplantation method of MSCs. PubMed, OVID, Cochrane, Web of Science, and China Biomedical Database were searched up until April 01, 2021. The study was conducted for five endpoints: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor and sensory score, ASIA grade improvement, Barthel Index (BI), and adverse reactions. Standard meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using Stata 14.0. Eighteen studies with a total of 949 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Standard meta-analysis showed that MSCs significantly improved ASIA motor score (P < 0.001), sensory score (P < 0.001), ASIA grade (P < 0.001), and BI (P < 0.001) compared to rehabilitation. In addition, in the network meta-analysis, autologous MSCs significantly improved the ASIA motor [MD = 8.01, 95% CI (4.27, 11.76)], sensory score [MD = 17.98, 95% CI (10.04, 25.91)], and BI [MD = 7.69, 95% CI (2.10, 13.29)] compared to rehabilitation. Similarly, compared to rehabilitation, intrathecal injection (IT) of MSCs significantly improved the ASIA motor [MD = 7.97, 95% CI (4.40, 11.53)] and sensory score [MD = 19.60, 95% CI (9.74, 29.46)]. Compared to rehabilitation, however, only the IL of MSCs was associated with more adverse reactions [OR = 17.82, 95% CI (2.48, 128.22)]. According to the results of SUCRA, both autologous MSCs and IT transplantation approaches most improved the neurological function in SCI patients. Cell transplantation using MSCs is effective in patients with SCI and IT of autologous MSCs may be more beneficial.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Witiw CD(2015)Acute spinal cord injury J Spinal Disord Tech 28 202-210
[2]  
Fehlings MG(2018)Traumatic spinal injury: global epidemiology and worldwide volume World Neurosurg 113 e345-e363
[3]  
Kumar R(2018)Traumatic spinal cord injury Continuum Minneap Minn 24 551-566
[4]  
Lim J(2015)Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993–2012 JAMA 313 2236-2243
[5]  
Mekary RA(2018)Acute spinal cord injury: a review of pathophysiology and potential of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pharmacological intervention J Chem Neuroanat 87 25-31
[6]  
Rabinstein AA(2017)Cell biology of spinal cord injury and repair J Clin Investig 127 3259-3270
[7]  
Jain NB(2018)Microenvironment imbalance of spinal cord injury Cell Transplant 27 853-866
[8]  
Ayers GD(2020)Neurovascular inflammaging in health and disease Cells 9 1614-240
[9]  
Peterson EN(2020)Multi-target approaches to CNS repair: olfactory mucosa-derived cells and heparan sulfates Nat Rev Neurol 16 229-237
[10]  
Hayta E(2019)Mesenchymal stem cells and the neuronal microenvironment in the area of spinal cord injury Neural Regen Res 14 227-1012