Social inequality of urban park use during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:0
作者
Ling Yu
Pengjun Zhao
Junqing Tang
Liang Pang
Zhaoya Gong
机构
[1] Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School,School of Urban Planning and Design
[2] Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Human-Earth Relations of Ministry of Natural Resources of China,School of Urban and Environmental Sciences
[3] Peking University,undefined
来源
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although many studies have examined social inequalities related to urban parks, there is limited knowledge about the social inequalities of urban park use during crises. By integrating a large amount of mobile phone data and e-commerce user data, this study tracked 81,350 anonymized individuals’ urban park use behavior in Shenzhen, China, from 2019 to 2021, covering a period before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results reveal that while most of the parks saw a reduction of over 50% in the number of visitors, some parks, especially relatively small and remote parks, had more visitors after the pandemic began than before. In addition, COVID-19 has caused residents’ urban parks use time to decrease and such impacts are more severe in vulnerable groups (e.g., females, the elderly, juveniles, and low-income groups). Moreover, there are significant inequalities in urban park use between rich and poor communities, and COVID-19 has slightly exacerbated these inequalities. The study highlighted that integrating mobile phone data with e-commerce data is an effective way to unveil the complex social inequalities behind human behavior. Findings could help to improve social equality in urban park use as well as providing insights for evidence-informed decision-making in post-pandemic recovery and future crises.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 176 条
[1]  
Abrams EM(2020)COVID-19 and the impact of social determinants of health Lancet Resp Med 8 659-661
[2]  
Szefler SJ(2022)Decolonizing the green city: from environmental privilege to emancipatory green justice Environ Justice 15 1-11
[3]  
Anguelovski I(2019)Why green “climate gentrification” threatens poor and vulnerable populations PNAS 116 26139-26143
[4]  
Brand AL(2020)Evaluating visitors’ travel demand and recreational values in Kallar Kahar Lake, Pakistan Environ Dev Sustain 22 7951-7967
[5]  
Ranganathan M(2020)The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities J Epidemiol Community Health 74 964-968
[6]  
Anguelovski I(2020)Parents’ and guardians’ views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine: a multimethods study in England Vaccine 38 7789-7798
[7]  
Connolly JJ(2022)A vicious cycle of health (in) equity: migrant inclusion in light of COVID-19 Health Policy Technol 11 100606-920
[8]  
Pearsall H(2020)The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence Lancet 395 912-11
[9]  
Bakhsh K(2020)Four profiles of inequality and tax redistribution in Europe Humanit Soc Sci Commun 7 33-1351
[10]  
Meshaal I(2021)Social inequalities: theories, concepts and problematics SN Soc Sci 1 1-1185