Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Aortic Function Evaluation in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

被引:0
作者
Andrea Guala
Gisela Teixido-Turá
Arturo Evangelista
Jose Rodriguez-Palomares
机构
[1] Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron,Department of Cardiology
[2] CIBER-CV,undefined
[3] Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca,undefined
[4] Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,undefined
来源
Artery Research | 2020年 / 26卷
关键词
Aortic aneurysm; 4D-flow CMR; magnetic resonance imaging; bicuspid aortic valve; Marfan syndrome; aortic stiffness; haemodynamics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Thoracic aortic aneurysm is a common cardiovascular disease consisting of marked dilation of the aorta. Aortic aneurysms carry a high risk of life-threatening complications such as aortic dissection or rupture. Classically, maximum aortic diameter has been used as the sole descriptor of aneurysm severity and is considered the main predictor of complications. However, maximum aortic diameter measurement is often poorly reproducible and about 60% of type A and 80% of type B aortic dissections occurred in patients with an aortic diameter inferior to that recommended for the indication of elective surgical treatment. Therefore, new biomarkers for risk stratification in thoracic aortic aneurysm are needed. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a non-invasive imaging technique widely used for diagnosis, clinical follow-up and research in thoracic aortic aneurysms. CMR applications to thoracic aortic aneurysms are generally based on either cine CMR images, which are time-resolved images providing dynamic structural visualization, or phase-contrast images, which utilise a flow-encoding gradient to assess time-resolved velocity data. Particularly with 3D velocity encoding (4D flow MRI), phase-contrast imaging permits detailed study of haemodynamic in thoracic aortic aneurysms while cine CMR is often used to assess aortic geometry and its changes through the cardiac cycle or during follow-up. The possibilities offered by CMR for studying thoracic aortic aneurysms and a description of their applications in Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) and Marfan patients are here reviewed.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 70
页数:5
相关论文
共 331 条
  • [1] Elefteriades JA(2010)Thoracic aortic aneurysm: clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties J Am Coll Cardiol 55 841-57
  • [2] Farkas EA(2014)2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 35 2873-9126
  • [3] Erbel RA(2016)Multimodality assessment of ascending aortic diameters: comparison of different measurement methods J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29 819-26.e4
  • [4] Aboyans V(2007)Aortic diameter 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type A aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Circulation 116 1120-27
  • [5] Boileau C(2011)Descending aortic diameter of 5.5 cm or greater is not an accurate predictor of acute type B aortic dissection J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 e101-e7
  • [6] Bossone E(2011)Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13 11-55
  • [7] Bartolomeo RD(2019)Proximal aorta longitudinal strain predicts aortic root dilation rate and aortic events in Marfan syndrome Eur Heart J 40 2047-17
  • [8] Eggebrecht H(2015)4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17 72-82
  • [9] Rodríguez-Palomares JF(2019)Validation of two accelerated 4D flow MRI sequences at 3 T: a phantom study Eur Radiol Exp 3 10-30
  • [10] Teixidó-Tura G(2018)Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20 28-507