Stress and Deformation Characteristics of Nonwoven Geotextile Reinforced Sand Under Different Directions of Principal Stress

被引:6
作者
Al-Rkaby A.H.J. [1 ]
Nikraz H.R. [1 ]
Chegenizadeh A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth
关键词
Anisotropy; Hollow cylinder apparatus; Nonwoven geotextile; Principal stress direction; Torsional test;
D O I
10.1007/s40891-017-0111-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A series of drained torsional shear tests using a hollow cylinder apparatus HCA was performed to investigate the anisotropic characteristics of sand in terms of the stress–strain and volumetric changes of large scale sand samples reinforced with nonwoven geotextile under different directions of principal stress α. Results revealed that the inclusion of geotextile resulted in a significant increase in the peak deviator stress when α was 0°, 15° and 30°, corresponding with considerable restraint against the expansion strain of the samples. When α was rotated towards the horizontal, α = 60–90°, reinforced samples exhibited clear anisotropic behavior. Variations in the peak deviator stress between the maximum value occurred at α = 0° and minimum at α = 60° was about 30–47% (depending on the number of geotextile layers). This indicates that the ability of layers embedded horizontally resisting the shearing decreased as the principal stress rotated towards the bedding plane. Under the conditions of α = 60–90° tensile strength of the geotextile could not be mobilized to the same extent, compared to α = 0–30°. Larger values of α resulted in less expansion strain of the reinforced samples. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Qian Y., Han J., Pokharel S.K., Parsons R.L., Experimental study on triaxial geogrid-reinforced bases over weak subgrade under cyclic loading, GeoFlorida 2010: advances in analysis, modeling & design, pp. 1208-1216, (2010)
  • [12] Abu-Farsakh M.Y., Chen Q., Evaluation of geogrid base reinforcement in flexible pavement using cyclic plate load testing, Int J Pavement Eng, 12, 3, pp. 275-288, (2011)
  • [13] Shukla S.K., Fundamentals of geosynthetics, Handbook of geosynthetic engineering: geosynthetics and their applications, pp. 1-44, (2012)
  • [14] Nguyen M.D., Yang K.H., Lee S.H., Wu C.S., Tsai M.H., Behavior of nonwoven-geotextile-reinforced sand and mobilization of reinforcement strain under triaxial compression, Geosynth Int, 20, 3, pp. 207-225, (2013)
  • [15] Chen R.H., Huang Y.W., Huang F.C., Confinement effect of geocells on sand samples under triaxial compression, Geotext Geomembr, 37, pp. 35-44, (2013)
  • [16] Shukla S.K., An Introduction to geosynthetic engineering, (2016)
  • [17] Das B.M., Use of geogrid in the construction of railroads, Innov Infrastruct Solut, 1, 1, pp. 1-12, (2016)
  • [18] Shukla S., Sivakugan N., Das B., A state-of-the-art review of geosynthetic-reinforced slopes, Int J Geotech Eng, 5, 1, pp. 17-32, (2011)
  • [19] Jardine R.J., Menkiti C.O., The undrained anisotropy of KO consolidated sediments L’Anisotropie non-drainee des sols consolides, Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Infrastructure: Theory and Practice, Planning and Design, Construction and Maintenance: Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2, (1999)
  • [20] Xiong H., Guo L., Cai Y., Yang Z., Experimental study of drained anisotropy of granular soils involving rotation of principal stress direction, Eur J Environ Civil Eng, 20, 4, pp. 431-454, (2016)