Stress and Deformation Characteristics of Nonwoven Geotextile Reinforced Sand Under Different Directions of Principal Stress

被引:6
作者
Al-Rkaby A.H.J. [1 ]
Nikraz H.R. [1 ]
Chegenizadeh A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth
关键词
Anisotropy; Hollow cylinder apparatus; Nonwoven geotextile; Principal stress direction; Torsional test;
D O I
10.1007/s40891-017-0111-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A series of drained torsional shear tests using a hollow cylinder apparatus HCA was performed to investigate the anisotropic characteristics of sand in terms of the stress–strain and volumetric changes of large scale sand samples reinforced with nonwoven geotextile under different directions of principal stress α. Results revealed that the inclusion of geotextile resulted in a significant increase in the peak deviator stress when α was 0°, 15° and 30°, corresponding with considerable restraint against the expansion strain of the samples. When α was rotated towards the horizontal, α = 60–90°, reinforced samples exhibited clear anisotropic behavior. Variations in the peak deviator stress between the maximum value occurred at α = 0° and minimum at α = 60° was about 30–47% (depending on the number of geotextile layers). This indicates that the ability of layers embedded horizontally resisting the shearing decreased as the principal stress rotated towards the bedding plane. Under the conditions of α = 60–90° tensile strength of the geotextile could not be mobilized to the same extent, compared to α = 0–30°. Larger values of α resulted in less expansion strain of the reinforced samples. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Chandrasekaran B., Broms B.B., Wong K.S., Strength of fabric reinforced sand under axisymmetric loading, Geotext Geomembr, 8, 4, pp. 293-310, (1989)
  • [2] Bathurst R.J., Karpurapu R., Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils, Geotech Test J, 16, 3, pp. 296-303, (1993)
  • [3] Das B.M., Omar M.T., The effects of foundation width on model tests for the bearing capacity of sand with geogrid reinforcement, Geotech Geol Eng, 12, 2, pp. 133-141, (1994)
  • [4] Higuchi T., Ishihara K., Tsukamoto Y., Masuo T., Deformation and strength of geogrid-reinforced granular soil at plane strain conditions, Soils Found, 38, 1, pp. 221-227, (1998)
  • [5] Haeri S.M., Noorzad R., Oskoorouchi A.M., Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sand, Geotext Geomembr, 18, 6, pp. 385-402, (2000)
  • [6] Shukla S.K., Yin J.H., Fundamentals of geosynthetic engineering, (2006)
  • [7] Latha M.G., Murthy V.S., Investigations on sand reinforced with different geosynthetics, Geotech Test J, 29, 6, pp. 474-481, (2006)
  • [8] Tafreshi S.M., Asakereh A., Strength evaluation of wet reinforced silty sand by triaxial test, Int J Civil Eng, 5, 4, pp. 274-283, (2007)
  • [9] Das B.M., Penman J., Anderson P.R., Use of geogrid in subgrade-ballast system of railroads subjected to cyclic loading for reducing maintenance, (2010)
  • [10] Anubhav, Basudhar P.K., Interface behavior of woven geotextile with rounded and angular particle sand, J Mater Civ Eng, 25, 12, pp. 1970-1974, (2013)