Methodological Decolonisation and Local Epistemologies in Business Ethics Research

被引:0
作者
Obaa Akua Konadu-Osei
Smaranda Boroş
Anita Bosch
机构
[1] Stellenbosch University,Stellenbosch Business School
[2] Vlerick Business School,undefined
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2023年 / 186卷
关键词
Business ethics research; Decolonising research; Governance research; Interpretivism; Local epistemologies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper contributes to the discussion on methodological decolonisation in business ethics research by illustrating how local epistemologies can shape methodology. Historically, business ethics research has been dominated by Western methodologies, which have been argued to be restrictive and limit contextually relevant theorising in non-Western contexts. Over the past decade, scholarship has called for more diversity in research methods and epistemologies. This paper regards arguments founded along neatly divided universalist versus contextualised methodologies as a false dilemma. Instead, we explore how ubuntu, a sub-Saharan African epistemology, can contribute as a complementary epistemology and methodology to interpretivism when conducting business ethics research in sub-Saharan Africa. The paper discusses four aspects—research agenda, access, power relations, and context-sensitive methods—that highlight practical ways in which ubuntu epistemology, with its communitarian and relational underpinnings, can enhance business ethics research. We illustrate that methodological decolonisation can be achieved by fusing relevant elements of local epistemologies and methodologies and conventional methodologies to generate context-relevant research approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Adeleye I(2020)Business ethics in Africa: The role of institutional context, social relevance, and development challenges Journal of Business Ethics 161 717-729
  • [2] Luiz J(2020)“But you are also Ghanaian, you should know”: Negotiating the insider–outsider research positionality in the fieldwork encounter Qualitative Inquiry 26 583-592
  • [3] Muthuri J(2012)Critical analysis of the production of Western knowledge and its implications for indigenous knowledge and decolonization Journal of Black Studies 43 599-619
  • [4] Amaeshi K(1995)Dismantling the divide between indigenous and western knowledge Development and Change 26 413-439
  • [5] Adu-Ampong EA(2021)Enchantment in business ethics research Journal of Business Ethics 174 251-262
  • [6] Adams EA(2015)Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research Qualitative Research 15 219-234
  • [7] Adyanga FA(2013)Indigenous knowledge: A false dawn for development theory and practice? Progress in Development Studies 13 231-243
  • [8] Agrawal A(2010)Business ethics research: A global perspective Journal of Business Ethics 95 39-53
  • [9] Bell E(2017)The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry Qualitative Inquiry 23 34-45
  • [10] Winchester N(2019)Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 12 93-103