What are the key themes associated with the positive learning experience in MOOCs? An empirical investigation of learners’ ratings and reviews

被引:0
作者
Ruiqi Deng
Pierre Benckendorff
机构
[1] Hangzhou Normal University,Department of Educational Technology, School of Education
[2] The University of Queensland,UQ Business School
来源
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education | / 18卷
关键词
Massive open online courses (MOOCs); Learning experience; Student ratings; Student reviews; Perceived quality of instruction; Text mining;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Past MOOC research has tended to focus on learning outcomes valued in traditional higher education settings, such as achievement and retention. This study recognises that student ratings are an important alternative outcome measure in MOOCs. This paper adopted a semiautomatic text mining approach to collect and analyse 8475 ratings and reviews submitted for 1794 MOOCs. The analysis revealed six important themes that contributed to positive ratings: ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘interesting’, ‘videos’, ‘recommend’, and ‘questions’. The paper then investigated the characteristics of each identified theme based on the proximity of themes, distribution of concepts within themes, and important connections. Based on research findings, the paper presents the following propositions to assist educators and providers to enhance the learning experience in MOOCs: (1) provide realistic learning contexts and instructional conditions in MOOCs to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge that transfers more readily to real-world practices; (2) carefully design the instructional conditions so that some mental challenge and stimulation is required for learners to achieve a full understanding of the content, rather than making MOOCs too simple or effortless to complete; (3) design the course content, materials, and communications to generate interest; (4) allocate sufficient resources to create high-quality video lectures; (5) employ video lectures to elicit positive emotions from MOOC learners and simplify complex, difficult concepts; and (6) incorporate discussion boards in MOOCs and invest in human and digital resources to address learners’ queries.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 234 条
  • [1] Alhija FN-A(2009)Student evaluation of instruction: What can be learned from students’ written comments? Studies in Educational Evaluation 35 37-44
  • [2] Fresko B(2007)Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 18 571-588
  • [3] Alves H(2005)The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: integration of uni- and multidimensional models Studies in Higher Education 30 723-748
  • [4] Raposo M(2014)MOOCs: striking the right balance between facilitation and self-determination MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10 31-43
  • [5] Apodaca P(2012)University performance evaluations: What are we really measuring? Studies in Higher Education 37 825-842
  • [6] Grad H(2005)Ratings of university teacher instruction: How much do student and course characteristics really matter? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 593-601
  • [7] Beaven T(2018)Is research mediating the relationship between teaching experience and student satisfaction? Studies in Higher Education 43 973-988
  • [8] Hauck M(1970)The measurement and analysis of college student satisfaction Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 3 110-118
  • [9] Comas-Quinn A(2020)Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education Higher Education 79 1023-1037
  • [10] Lewis T(2011)Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers International Journal for Academic Development 16 133-145