Making Science Accessible: A Semiotics of Scientific Communication

被引:0
作者
Christopher H. Lowrey
Priya Venkatesan
机构
[1] Dartmouth Medical School,Department of Medicine and Pharmacology and Toxicology
[2] Dartmouth College,The Institute for Writing and Rhetoric
来源
Biosemiotics | 2008年 / 1卷
关键词
Semiotics; Structuralism; Scientific communication; Public understanding of science; Metaphors in science; Scientific discourse; Semiotic square; Gleevec; Philadelphia chromosome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article serves as a demonstration of how certain models of literary analysis, used to theorize and analyze fiction and narrative, can also be applied to scientific communication in such a manner as to promote the accessibility of science to the general public and a greater awareness of the methodology used in making scientific discovery. The approach of this article is based on the assumption that the principles of structuralism and semiotics can provide plausible explanations for the divide between the reception of science and literature. We provide a semiotic analysis of a scientific article that has had significant impact in the field of molecular biology with profound medical implications. Furthermore, we show how the structural and semiotic characteristics of literary texts are also evident in the scientific papers, and we address how these characteristics can be applied to scientific prose in order to propose a model of scientific communication that reaches the public. By applying this theoretical framework to the analysis of both scientific and literary communication, we establish parallels between primary scientific texts and literary prose.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 269
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Burns T. W.(2003)Science communication: A contemporary definition Public Understanding of Science 12 183-202
  • [2] O’Connor D. J.(1997)The tyrosine kinase inhibitor CGP57148B selectively inhibits the growth of BCR-ABL-positive cells Blood 90 3691-3698
  • [3] Stocklmayer S. M.(1995)The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain Public Understanding of Science 4 57-74
  • [4] Deininger M. W. N.(2003)“Scientific Metaphor Going Public.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 1247-1263
  • [5] Goldman J. M.(2005)Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: a study of the development of the metaphor of the genetic code Public Understanding of Science 14 373-392
  • [6] Lydon N.(2003)The spectrum of scientific literacy: An in-depth look at what it means to be scientifically-literature Public Understanding of Science 12 183-202
  • [7] Melo J. V.(2004)Science in the news: a study of reporting genomics Public Understanding of Science 13 309-322
  • [8] Evans G.(2001)Science, story, and image: a new approach to crossing the communication barrier posed by scientific jargon Public Understanding of Science 10 157-171
  • [9] Durant J.(1993)Why the statement: ‘Plasma-membrane transport is rate-limiting for its metabolism in rat-liver parenchymal cells’ cannot meet the public Public Understanding of Science 2 351-364
  • [10] Knudsen S.(2002)Pandora’s box or panacea? Using metaphors to create the public representations of biotechnology Public Understanding of Science 11 5-32