Comparison of sodium removal in peritoneal dialysis patients treated by continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis

[1] Davenport A(2009)Peritonitis remains the major clinical complication of peritoneal dialysis: the London, UK, peritonitis audit 2002–2003 Perit Dial Int 29 297-302

[2] Brown EA(2003)Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study J Am Soc Nephrol 14 2948-2957

[3] Davies SJ(2010)Superior survival of high transporters treated with automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis Nephrol Dial Transplant 25 1973-1979

[4] Rutherford P(2014)Association between bioimpedance analysis parameters and left ventricular hypertrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients Int Urol Nephrol 46 1851-1856

[5] Meeus F(2018)Renal replacement modality and stroke risk in end-stage renal disease—a national registry study Nephrol Dial Transplant 33 1564-1571

[6] Borras M(2011)Comparison of outcomes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis: results from a USA database Perit Dial Int 31 679-684

[7] Riegel W(2017)Incident elderly patients on peritoneal dialysis: epidemiological characteristics and modality impact on survival time Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 28 782-791

[8] Divino Filho JC(2015)Automated peritoneal dialysis is associated with better survival rates compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score matching analysis PLoS One 10 e0134047-193

[9] Vonesh E(2001)Peritoneal sodium mass removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: influence on blood pressure control Am J Nephrol 21 189-266

[10] van Bree M(2017)Routine monitoring of sodium and phosphorus removal in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients treated with continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), automated PD (APD) or combined CAPD + APD Kidney Blood Press Res 42 257-145

[1] Davenport A(2009)Peritonitis remains the major clinical complication of peritoneal dialysis: the London, UK, peritonitis audit 2002–2003 Perit Dial Int 29 297-302

[2] Brown EA(2003)Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study J Am Soc Nephrol 14 2948-2957

[3] Davies SJ(2010)Superior survival of high transporters treated with automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis Nephrol Dial Transplant 25 1973-1979

[4] Rutherford P(2014)Association between bioimpedance analysis parameters and left ventricular hypertrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients Int Urol Nephrol 46 1851-1856

[5] Meeus F(2018)Renal replacement modality and stroke risk in end-stage renal disease—a national registry study Nephrol Dial Transplant 33 1564-1571

[6] Borras M(2011)Comparison of outcomes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis: results from a USA database Perit Dial Int 31 679-684

[7] Riegel W(2017)Incident elderly patients on peritoneal dialysis: epidemiological characteristics and modality impact on survival time Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 28 782-791

[8] Divino Filho JC(2015)Automated peritoneal dialysis is associated with better survival rates compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score matching analysis PLoS One 10 e0134047-193

[9] Vonesh E(2001)Peritoneal sodium mass removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: influence on blood pressure control Am J Nephrol 21 189-266

[10] van Bree M(2017)Routine monitoring of sodium and phosphorus removal in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients treated with continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), automated PD (APD) or combined CAPD + APD Kidney Blood Press Res 42 257-145