The influence of altruistic personality, interpersonal distance and social observation on prosocial behavior: An event-related potential (ERP) study

被引:0
作者
Mei Li
Jin Li
Guanfei Zhang
Wei Fan
Yiping Zhong
Hong Li
机构
[1] Hunan Normal University,Department of Psychology
[2] South China Normal University,Department of Psychology
[3] Cognition and Human behaviour Key Laboratory of Hunan Province,Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences
[4] Sichuan Normal University,undefined
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2023年 / 23卷
关键词
Altruistic personality; Interpersonal distance; Social observation; Prosocial behaviors; ERPs; P3;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The psychological mechanisms that high and low altruists exhibit in different contexts remain unknown. This study examined the underlying mechanisms of the effect of altruistic personality, social observation, and interpersonal distance on prosocial behavior using event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants with high and low altruism were asked to make prosocial or non-prosocial choices toward different interpersonal distances (friends, acquaintances, or strangers) under the (non)observer condition. The electrophysiological responses to the choice stimuli were simultaneously recorded. The behavioral results demonstrated that high altruists had more prosocial choices, and these choices were unaffected by interpersonal distance and social observation. However, low altruists made more prosocial choices toward friends and acquaintances under the observer than nonobserver conditions, whereas their prosocial choices toward strangers showed no difference. The ERP results demonstrated that low altruists showed more negative N2 when the choice stimuli were toward strangers and acquaintances or under the nonobserver condition. Furthermore, low altruists showed larger P3 under the observer than nonobserver conditions when the choice stimuli were toward friends and acquaintances, while this difference was absent when the choice stimuli were toward strangers. However, for high altruists, no effect of interpersonal distance and social observation was observed in N2 and P3. These results suggest that the prosocial behavior of low altruists is mainly driven by reputational incentives, whereas high altruists are primarily motivated by concern about the well-being of others. Our findings provide insights into the prosocial behavior of high and low altruists in different contexts and support the empathy-altruism hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1472
页数:12
相关论文
共 257 条
[1]  
Aron A(1992)Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 596-612
[2]  
Aron EN(2004)Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons" Evolution and Human Behavior 25 209-220
[3]  
Smollan D(2020)Greener than thou: People who protect the environment are more cooperative, compete to be environmental, and benefit from reputation Journal of Environmental Psychology 72 101441-36
[4]  
Barclay P(2001)Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma II: What if the target of empathy has defected? European Journal of Social Psychology 31 25-77
[5]  
Barclay P(1988)Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 52-195
[6]  
Barker JL(2020)Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 118 186-245
[7]  
Batson CD(2010)The Presence of Others, Prosocial Traits, Machiavellianism A Personality × Situation Approach Social Psychology 41 238-365
[8]  
Ahmad N(2004)Altruistic personality in the context of the empathy–altruism hypothesis European Journal of Personality 18 351-796
[9]  
Batson CD(2012)Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy Brain Structure and Function 217 783-1265
[10]  
Dyck JL(2012)MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis Behavior Research Methods 44 1255-458