Impacts of climate change and agricultural activities on water quality in the Lower Kaidu River Basin, China

被引:0
作者
Wulong Ba
Pengfei Du
Tie Liu
Anming Bao
Xi Chen
Jiao Liu
Chengxin Qin
机构
[1] Tsinghua University,State Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment
[2] Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology
[3] CAS,School of Energy and Power Engineering
[4] Xihua University,undefined
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2020年 / 30卷
关键词
climate change; agricultural management; non-point pollutants; SWAT; Kaidu River Basin; water quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the context of climate change and over-exploitation of water resources, water shortage and water pollution in arid regions have become major constraints to local sustainable development. In this study, we established a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for simulating non-point source (NPS) pollution in the irrigation area of the lower reaches of the Kaidu River Basin, based on spatial and attribute data (2010–2014). Four climate change scenarios (2040–2044) and two agricultural management scenarios were input into the SWAT model to quantify the effects of climate change and agricultural management on solvents and solutes of pollutants in the study area. The simulation results show that compared to the reference period (2010–2014), with a decline in streamflow from the Kaidu River, the average annual irrigation water consumption is expected to decrease by 3.84x108 m3 or 8.87% during the period of 2040–2044. Meanwhile, the average annual total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in agricultural drainage canals will also increase by 10.50% and 30.06%, respectively. Through the implementation of agricultural management measures, the TN and TP in farmland drainage can be reduced by 14.49% and 16.03%, respectively, reaching 661.56 t and 12.99 t, accordingly, and the increasing water efficiency can save irrigation water consumption by 4.41 x108 m3 or 4.77%. The results indicate that although the water environment in the irrigation area in the lower reaches of the Kaidu River Basin is deteriorating, the situation can be improved by implementing appropriate agricultural production methods. The quantitative analysis results of NPS pollutants in the irrigation area under different scenarios provide a scientific basis for water environmental management in the Kaidu River Basin.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 176
页数:12
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Abbaspour K C(2004)Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure Vadose Zone Journal 3 1340-1352
[2]  
Johnson C A(2010)Application of SWAT model to investigate nitrate leaching in Hamadan-Bahar Watershed, Iran Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 139 675-688
[3]  
Genuchten M T V(2011)Duration analysis of adoption of drip irrigation technology in southeastern Spain Technological Forecasting & Social Change 78 991-1001
[4]  
Akhavan S(2014)Assessing the impacts of climate change on hydrology of the upper reach of the Spree River: Germany Water Resources Management 28 2731-2749
[5]  
Abedi-Koupai J(2018)Simulating hydrological responses to climate change using dynamic and statistical downscaling methods: A case study in the Kaidu River Basin, Xinjiang, China Journal of Arid Land 10 905-920
[6]  
Mousavi S F(2010)Climate change impact on the hydrological extremes in the Kaidu River Basin, China Journal of Flood Engineering 1 93-108
[7]  
Alcon F(2014)Modelling mitigation options to reduce diffuse nitrogen water pollution from agriculture Science of the Total Environment 468 1267-1277
[8]  
Miguel M D D(2011)Contributions of climate change on water resources in semi-arid areas: Example of the Essaouira Basin (Morocco) Geographia Technica 1 1-8
[9]  
Burton M(2010)Hydrology and water resources variation and its response to regional climate change in Xinjiang Journal of Geographical Sciences 20 599-612
[10]  
Al-Mukhtar M(2002)Analysis of water environment in the Xinjiang arid region Arid Environmental Monitoring 16 223-224