Genome editing of polyploid crops: prospects, achievements and bottlenecks

被引:0
|
作者
Jan G. Schaart
Clemens C. M. van de Wiel
Marinus J. M. Smulders
机构
[1] Wageningen University and Research,Plant Breeding
来源
Transgenic Research | 2021年 / 30卷
关键词
Genome editing; Polyploid crops; CRISPR/Cas; TALENs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Plant breeding aims to develop improved crop varieties. Many crops have a polyploid and often highly heterozygous genome, which may make breeding of polyploid crops a real challenge. The efficiency of traditional breeding based on crossing and selection has been improved by using marker-assisted selection (MAS), and MAS is also being applied in polyploid crops, which helps e.g. for introgression breeding. However, methods such as random mutation breeding are difficult to apply in polyploid crops because there are multiple homoeologous copies (alleles) of each gene. Genome editing technology has revolutionized mutagenesis as it enables precisely selecting targets. The genome editing tool CRISPR/Cas is especially valuable for targeted mutagenesis in polyploids, as all alleles and/or copies of a gene can be targeted at once. Even multiple genes, each with multiple alleles, may be targeted simultaneously. In addition to targeted mutagenesis, targeted replacement of undesirable alleles by desired ones may become a promising application of genome editing for the improvement of polyploid crops, in the near future. Several examples of the application of genome editing for targeted mutagenesis are described here for a range of polyploid crops, and achievements and bottlenecks are highlighted.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New prospects on the horizon: Genome editing to engineer plants for desirable traits
    Iqbal, Zahra
    Iqbal, Mohammed Shariq
    Ahmad, Ausaf
    Memon, Anjuman Gul
    Ansari, Mohammad Israil
    CURRENT PLANT BIOLOGY, 2020, 24
  • [42] Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security
    Georges, Fawzy
    Ray, Heather
    GM CROPS & FOOD-BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE AND THE FOOD CHAIN, 2017, 8 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [43] Genome editing based trait improvement in crops: current perspective, challenges and opportunities
    Surender Singh
    Roni Chaudhary
    Vadthya Lokya
    Siddharth Tiwari
    The Nucleus, 2024, 67 : 97 - 126
  • [44] Genome editing based trait improvement in crops: current perspective, challenges and opportunities
    Singh, Surender
    Chaudhary, Roni
    Lokya, Vadthya
    Tiwari, Siddharth
    NUCLEUS-INDIA, 2024, 67 (01): : 97 - 126
  • [45] Cutting-Edge Genome Editing in Sugarcane and Sugar Crops: A Comprehensive Overview
    Molinari, Mayla Daiane Correa
    Fuganti-Pagliarini, Renata
    Freitas, Natalia Chagas
    Abbad, Samantha Vieira
    Molinari, Hugo Bruno Correa
    SUGAR TECH, 2025, 27 (01) : 44 - 57
  • [46] Harnessing the native type I-B CRISPR-Cas for genome editing in a polyploid archaeon
    Feiyue Cheng
    Luyao Gong
    Dahe Zhao
    Haibo Yang
    Jian Zhou
    Ming Li
    Hua Xiang
    JournalofGeneticsandGenomics, 2017, 44 (11) : 541 - 548
  • [47] Harnessing the native type I-B CRISPR-Cas for genome editing in a polyploid archaeon
    Cheng, Feiyue
    Gong, Luyao
    Zhao, Dahe
    Yang, Haibo
    Zhou, Jian
    Li, Ming
    Xiang, Hua
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2017, 44 (11) : 541 - 548
  • [48] CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing is revolutionizing the improvement of horticultural crops: Recent advances and future prospects
    Kaur, Harmeet
    Pandey, Devendra Kumar
    Goutam, Umesh
    Kumar, Vijay
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2021, 289
  • [49] Genome editing research initiatives and regulatory landscape of genome edited crops in India
    Sharma, Neha
    Thakur, Kanika
    Zinta, Rasna
    Mangal, Vikas
    Dalamu, Jagesh Kumar
    Tiwari, Jagesh Kumar
    Sood, Salej
    Dutt, Som
    Kumar, Vinod
    Singh, Brajesh
    Thakur, Ajay Kumar
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2025, 34 (01)
  • [50] Affected Genome Editing Crops: The Consequences of Genome-Edited Babies in China
    Hao Li
    San Yin
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, 26 : 1847 - 1850