Robot Autonomy vs. Human Autonomy: Social Robots, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Nature of Autonomy

被引:0
作者
Paul Formosa
机构
[1] Macquarie University,Department of Philosophy & Centre for Agency, Values and Ethics
来源
Minds and Machines | 2021年 / 31卷
关键词
Autonomy; Social robots; Artificial intelligence (AI); Machine ethics; Artificial moral agents; Respect;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Social robots are robots that can interact socially with humans. As social robots and the artificial intelligence (AI) that powers them becomes more advanced, they will likely take on more social and work roles. This has many important ethical implications. In this paper, we focus on one of the most central of these, the impacts that social robots can have on human autonomy. We argue that, due to their physical presence and social capacities, there is a strong potential for social robots to enhance human autonomy as well as several ways they can inhibit and disrespect it. We argue that social robots could improve human autonomy by helping us to achieve more valuable ends, make more authentic choices, and improve our autonomy competencies. We also argue that social robots have the potential to harm human autonomy by instead leading us to achieve fewer valuable ends ourselves, make less authentic choices, decrease our autonomy competencies, make our autonomy more vulnerable, and disrespect our autonomy. Whether the impacts of social robots on human autonomy are positive or negative overall will depend on the design, regulation, and use we make of social robots in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 616
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Robot Autonomy vs. Human Autonomy: Social Robots, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Nature of Autonomy [J].
Formosa, Paul .
MINDS AND MACHINES, 2021, 31 (04) :595-616
[2]   Artificial Intelligence, Medicine and Autonomy [J].
Bracanovic, Tomislav .
NOVA PRISUTNOST, 2021, 19 (01) :63-76
[3]   AI Systems and Respect for Human Autonomy [J].
Laitinen, Arto ;
Sahlgren, Otto .
FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 4
[4]   Empowering Adaptive Human Autonomy Collaboration with Artificial Intelligence [J].
Alix, Christophe ;
Lafond, Daniel ;
Mattioli, Juliette ;
De Heer, Johan ;
Chattington, Mark ;
Robic, Pierre-Olivier .
2021 16TH INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (SOSE), 2021, :126-131
[5]   Is There a Trade-Off Between Human Autonomy and the 'Autonomy' of AI Systems? [J].
Prunkl, Carina .
PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 2021, 2022, 63 :67-71
[6]   Revolutionizing Social Robotics: A Cloud-Based Framework for Enhancing the Intelligence and Autonomy of Social Robots [J].
Elfaki, Abdelrahman Osman ;
Abduljabbar, Mohammed ;
Ali, Luqman ;
Alnajjar, Fady ;
Mehiar, Dua'a ;
Marei, Ashraf M. ;
Alhmiedat, Tareq ;
Al-Jumaily, Adel .
ROBOTICS, 2023, 12 (02)
[7]   Can artificial intelligence be a Kantian moral agent? On moral autonomy of AI system [J].
Arunima Chakraborty ;
Nisigandha Bhuyan .
AI and Ethics, 2024, 4 (2) :325-331
[8]   Legal Challenges of Humanizing Robots. A Study of the Responsibility and Autonomy of Robots Equipped with Artificial Intelligence [J].
Shehta, Mohamed F. ;
Ibrahem, Usama M. ;
Khalifa, Gamal S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2025, 19 :21-32
[9]   VULNERABILITY VS. AUTONOMY CONTEMPORARY MIGRATION CONFLICTS [J].
Bonilla, Alcira B. .
PASSAGENS-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL HISTORY AND LEGAL CULTURE, 2010, 2 (04) :4-38
[10]   Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction Scenarios for Entertainment [J].
Perula-Martinez, Raul ;
Castro-Gonzalez, Alvaro ;
Malfaz, Maria ;
Salichs, Miguel A. .
COMPANION OF THE 2017 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'17), 2017, :259-260