The Utility of Patient Engagement in Drug Research and Development

被引:0
作者
Avani Patel
Daniel Fiebig
Juliette Muszka
机构
[1] Sanofi,
来源
Pharmaceutical Medicine | 2021年 / 35卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drug development of transformative medicine has compounding complexity as researchers seek to address the varying needs of patients, providers, payers, and policymakers. Patient engagement frameworks and guidance are under development with health authorities that will further guide patient engagement in drug research. Patient insights have been captured in registries, online health networks, and other forums to inform evidence on disease progression and identify gaps in care. Patient representation and disease awareness have improved in partnership with patient advocacy groups that have led to patient-informed drug development. One effort to incorporate the patient voice into early research and development (R&D) is the Patient Insights Database (PID). Currently comprising 102 indications, the PID was developed to uncover trends in mixed methods research data, including direct patient interviews and evidence-based medicine. The database is used to understand patient symptomology, diagnosis, treatment, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), economic burden, and hope for new therapies, based on patient interviews, patient testimonials, real-world evidence studies, and HR-QoL research. A deep understanding of the patient experience informs internal R&D decisions to bring forth healthcare solutions that address patient needs.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 162
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Levitan B(2018)Assessing the financial value of patient engagement: a quantitative approach from CTTI's patient groups and clinical trials project Ther Innov Regul Sci. 52 220-229
[2]  
Getz K(2016)Increasing patient involvement in drug development Value Health. 19 869-878
[3]  
Eisenstein EL(2018)EUPATI and patients in medicines research and development: guidance for patient involvement in regulatory processes Front Med (Lausanne). 5 230-S63
[4]  
Lowe MM(2018)building meaningful patient engagement in research: case study from ADVANCE clinical data research network Med Care. 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 S58-184
[5]  
Blaser DA(2014)21st Annual Conference of the international society for quality of life research Qual Life Res 23 1-63
[6]  
Cone L(2017)Patient value: perspectives from the advocacy community Health Expect 21 57-undefined
[7]  
Haerry D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Landgraf C(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Warner K(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Warren NT(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined