Religious Education in Zambia: social justice

被引:0
作者
Brendan Carmody
机构
[1] UCL: University College London,
来源
Journal of Religious Education | 2023年 / 71卷
关键词
Religion Religious EducationLearning about; Learning from; Social transformation; Zambia; Social justice; Social inequality; Inclusion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Religious Education has long been part of Zambia’s primary and secondary education curriculum. Though it contains a social justice section, it has been weakly socially transformative. This could be seen to be a major challenge today if Religious Education is to be educational. With a swiftly expanding social situation placing increasing numbers at the margins, it is argued that this frail transformative element in Religious Education results primarily because Religious Education has been assimilated by the main inegalitarian education system, which continues to be misinterpreted as delivering social justice.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 61
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Barnes LP(2001)What is wrong with the phenomenological approach to Religious Education? Religious Education 96 445-461
[2]  
Beirne C(1985)Jesuit Education for justice: The Collegio in El Salvador, 1968–1984 Harvard Educational Review 55 1-19
[3]  
Calvert J(2014)Educational equality: Luck egalitarian, pluralist and complex Journal of the Philosophy of Education 48 69-85
[4]  
Carmody B(1990)Denominational secondary schooling in post-independence Zambia: A case study African Affairs 89 247-263
[5]  
Carmody B(2004)Religious education in Zambia: Can it survive? The Challenge 6 32-33
[6]  
Carmody B(2006)Perspectives on religion and nationalism in Zambia African Social Research 52 1-14
[7]  
Carmody B(2008)The nature and role of religious studies at the University of Zambia British Journal of Religious Education 30 25-35
[8]  
Carmody B(2014)Lonergan and interreligious education Religious Education 110 505-506
[9]  
Carmody B(2015)Lonergan and interreligious education Religious Education 110 505-506
[10]  
Carmody B(2017)The Catholic school: Non-confessional? International Studies in Catholic Education 9 169-170