Values of Australian Meat Consumers Related to Sheep and Beef Cattle Welfare: What Makes a Good Life and a Good Death?

被引:7
作者
Buddle E.A. [1 ]
Bray H.J. [1 ,2 ]
Ankeny R.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Food Values Research Group, School of Humanities, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, SA
[2] School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, WA
关键词
Australia; Livestock animal welfare; Meat; Natural; Slaughter;
D O I
10.1007/s41055-022-00114-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There has been growing global interest in livestock animal welfare. Previous research into attitudes towards animal welfare has focused on Europe and the United States, with comparatively little focus on Australia, which is an important location due to the prominent position of agriculture economically and culturally. In this article, we present results from qualitative research on how Australian meat consumers conceptualise sheep and beef cattle welfare. The study was conducted in two capital cities (Melbourne, Victoria and Adelaide, South Australia) and a much smaller rural centre (Toowoomba, Queensland) using focus groups (involving 40.9% of participants) and mall-intercept interviews (59.1% of participants), totalling 66 participants. Qualitative analysis highlights that participants had clear ideas of what it means for an animal to live a ‘good life’ and experience a ‘good death,’ with their beliefs strongly tied to their expectations and cultural understandings of what Australian agriculture ‘should be.’ In response to open-ended questions, participants expressed attitudes that relied on romanticised visions of the ‘rural idyll’ as seen in frequent discussions about what is ‘normal’ for sheep meat and beef production, and relatedly, what count as ‘natural behaviours.’ Many participants rejected anything associated with the ‘other,’ classifying it as not ‘normal’: we argue that which is not considered normal, including intensive production, foreign ownership, and halal slaughter practices, appear to place participants’ conceptualizations of an animal’s ‘good death,’ and in turn the potential for a ‘good life,’ at risk. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 108 条
[21]  
Buddle E.A., Bray H.J., Pitchford W.S., Keeping it ‘inside the fence’: An Examination of Responses to a Farm Animal Welfare Issue on Twitter, Animal Production Science, 58, 3, pp. 435-444, (2017)
[22]  
Buddle E.A., Bray H.J., Ankeny R.A., ‘Why would we believe them?’ Meat Consumers’ Reactions to Online Farm Animal Welfare Activism in Australia, Communication Research and Practice, 4, 3, pp. 246-260, (2018)
[23]  
Buddle E.A., Bray H.J., Ankeny R.A., I feel sorry for them”: Australian meat consumers’ perceptions about sheep and beef cattle transportation, Animals, 8, 10, (2018)
[24]  
Bush A.J., Hair J.F., An Assessment of Mall Intercept as a Data Collection Method, Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 2, pp. 158-167, (1985)
[25]  
Cairns K., McPhail D., Chevrier C., Bucklaschuk J., The Family Behind the Farm: Race and Affective Geographies of Manitoba Pork Production, Antipode, 47, 5, pp. 1184-1202, (2015)
[26]  
Carey R., Parker C., Scrinis G., Capturing the Meaning of ‘Free Range’: The Contest between Producers, Supermarkets and Consumers for the Higher Welfare Egg Label in Australia, Journal of Rural Studies, 54, pp. 266-275, (2017)
[27]  
Charmaz K., Constructing Grounded Theory, (2006)
[28]  
Chen P., Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, (2016)
[29]  
Chen P., In the Media, Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, pp. 85-122, (2016)
[30]  
Cockfield G., Botterill L.C., Signs of Countrymindedness: A Survey of Attitudes to Rural Industries and People, Australian Journal of Political Science, 47, 4, pp. 609-622, (2012)