Mechanical behaviour of the post processed 3D printed PLA parts using polar and non-polar solvents

被引:0
作者
Nagarjun Jayakumar
Hariharan Arumugam
Anto Dilip Albert Selvaraj
机构
[1] PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research,Polymer Engineering Laboratory
来源
Polymer Bulletin | 2024年 / 81卷
关键词
Post processing; Chemical vapour technique; FDM; Solvents; Polarity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
FDM, being the most popular AM technology, has a wide user base across the globe. The process makes use of a layer-by-layer approach, causing a staircase effect on the material’s printed surface. Though it affects several mechanical properties, its effect on surface integrity is highly detrimental and needs to be addressed. Chemical vapour dip and immersion techniques can provide a rapid solution using solvents. The solvents employed in the current study were the polar solvents- acetone and ethyl acetate, the mid-polar solvent- tetrahydrofuran (THF), and the non-polar solvents- chloroform and dichloromethane (DCM). The superior surface finish obtained during the post processing of 3D printed parts was having mean roughness value (Ra) of 0.67 µm, originally 11.42 µm. It was obtained when experimentation was carried out with the chemical vapour technique using THF. The optimum surface finish was readily achieved with mid- and non-polar solvents, whereas the polar solvents were slow to react with the surface of the PLA. A number of variables, including the solvent's polarity, boiling point, vapour pressure, and water miscibility, have an impact on the final surface's appearance and strength. During vapour treatment, the tensile strength of the 3D printed parts got reduced between 11.6% (THF) to 43.78% (DCM). On the other hand, the chemical immersion technique has a even more impact on the material’s strength and hardness. It reduces hardness to the maximum of 44.41% (THF), whereas the vapour evaporation technique reduces hardness by only up to 14.64% (chloroform).
引用
收藏
页码:4257 / 4274
页数:17
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Palanisamy C(2022)Additive manufacturing: a review on mechanical properties of polyjet and FDM printed parts Polym Bull 79 7065-7116
[2]  
Raman R(2023)FDM-based additive manufacturing of recycled thermoplastics and associated composites J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 66 1-27
[3]  
Dhanraj PK(2023)A review on poly lactic acid (PLA) as a biodegradable polymer Polym Bull 80 1179-1213
[4]  
Mishra V(2014)Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost Rapid Prototyp J 6 66-75
[5]  
Negi S(2019)A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics J Manuf Mater Process 3 64-49
[6]  
Kar S(2019)Impact of chemical post-processing in fused deposition modelling (FDM) on polylactic acid (PLA) surface quality and structure Polymers 11 566-2191
[7]  
Taib N-AAB(2022)Chemical vapor treatment to improve surface finish of 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) parts realized by fused filament fabrication Prog Addit Manuf 7 65-514
[8]  
Durgun I(2023)Overcoming the post-processing barriers for 3D-printed medical models Rapid Prototyp J 29 33-1346
[9]  
Ertan R(2017)Chemical vapor treatment of ABS parts built by FDM: analysis of surface finish and mechanical strength Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89 2175-234
[10]  
Dey A(2021)A review on the various processing parameters in FDM Mater Today Proc 37 509-42