Incorporation of radial basis function with Gorilla Troops Optimization and Moth-Flame Optimization to predict the compressive strength of high-performance concrete

被引:0
作者
Jin Zhao
Tingting Wu
Jun Li
Liying Shi
机构
[1] Jilin Business and Technology College,Network Construction and Information Management Center
[2] Shandong Vocational College of Science and Technology,College of Engineering
[3] Shandong Vocational College of Economics and Trade,undefined
[4] Jilin Business and Technology College,undefined
来源
Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
High-performance concrete; Compressive strength; Gorilla Troops Optimization; Moth-Flame Optimization; Radial basis function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current trends in modern research revolve around new technologies that can predict material properties without the expense of time, effort, and experimentation. Adapting machine learning methods to calculate various attributes of materials is receiving increasing attention. This study aims to forecast the 28-day compressive strength of high-performance concrete using both stand-alone and compound machine learning techniques. To this end, a stand-alone radial basis function and two ensemble optimizers, Gorilla Troops Optimization and Moth-Flame Optimization, have been applied. The R2 (coefficient of determination), RMSE (root mean absolute error), MAE (mean absolute error), SI (scatter index), and NRMSE (normalized root mean squared error) cross-validation were used to validate the performance of each model. In addition, the input parameters’ contribution to the outcomes’ forecast is specified by using a sensitivity analysis. All techniques used have proven to show improved performance in predicting results. The RBF–MFO model was the most accurate, with an R2 value of 0.996, compared to the RBF–GTO, with an R2 value of 0.987. Moreover, in the RBF–MFO index, RMSE = 0.937, NRMSE = 0.0149, MAE = 0.1875, and SI = 0.0149. On the other hand, for the combined RBF–GTO model, RMSE = 1.9588, NRMSE = 0.0304, MAE = 0.8111, and SI = 0.0304. Based on the data obtained, it is clear that the combined RBF–MFO model has achieved better performance.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:13
相关论文
共 128 条
  • [1] Abdollahzadeh B(2021)Artificial gorilla troops optimizer: a new nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems Int J Intell Syst 36 5887-5958
  • [2] SoleimanianGharehchopogh F(2020)Properties prediction of environmentally friendly ultra-high-performance concrete using artificial neural networks Eur J Environ Civ Eng 26 2319-2343
  • [3] Mirjalili S(2020)Data driven models for compressive strength prediction of concrete at high temperatures Front Struct Civ Eng 14 311-321
  • [4] Abellán García J(2021)Design of cascaded PI-fractional order PID controller for improving the frequency response of hybrid microgrid system using gorilla troops optimizer IEEE Access 9 150715-150732
  • [5] Fernández Gómez J(2018)Moth Flame Optimization based on golden section search and its application for link prediction problem Mod Appl Sci 13 10-27
  • [6] Torres Castellanos N(1996)Median radial basis function neural network IEEE Trans Neural Netw 7 1351-1364
  • [7] Akbari M(2011)Indian fly ashes: their characteristics and potential for mechanochemical activation for enhanced usability J Mater Civ Eng 23 783-788
  • [8] JafariDeligani V(2017)A fuzzy adaptive resonance theory-based model for mix proportion estimation of high-performance concrete Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 32 772-786
  • [9] Ali M(2007)Effect of fly ash fineness on microstructure of blended cement paste Constr Build Mater 21 1534-1541
  • [10] Kotb H(2014)Machine learning in concrete strength simulations: multi-nation data analytics Constr Build Mater 73 771-780