Radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation with irrigated tip catheter using remote magnetic navigation compared with conventional manual method

[1] Zulkifly H(2018)Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation Int J Clin Pract 72 e13070-2280

[2] Lip GYH(2014)2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary J Am Coll Cardiol 64 2246-252

[3] Lane DA(2011)Comparison of magnetic navigation system and conventional method in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is magnetic navigation system is more effective and safer than conventional method? Korean Circ J 41 248-1475

[4] January CT(2004)Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system Circulation 109 1472-32

[5] Wann LS(2013)Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a high-volume centre with the use of intracardiac echocardiography EP Eur 15 24-874

[6] Alpert JS(2007)Remote magnetic navigation J Am Coll Cardiol 50 868-505

[7] Calkins H(2012)Long-term efficacy of single procedure remote magnetic catheter navigation for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23 499-560

[8] Cigarroa JE(2003)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 557-S16

[9] Cleveland JC(2016)Safety and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using magnetic navigation versus manual conventional ablation: a propensity-score analysis J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27 S11-43

[10] Choi MS(2011)Remote magnetic versus manual catheters: evaluation of ablation effect in atrial fibrillation by myocardial marker levels J Interv Card Electrophysiol 32 37-495

[1] Zulkifly H(2018)Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation Int J Clin Pract 72 e13070-2280

[2] Lip GYH(2014)2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary J Am Coll Cardiol 64 2246-252

[3] Lane DA(2011)Comparison of magnetic navigation system and conventional method in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is magnetic navigation system is more effective and safer than conventional method? Korean Circ J 41 248-1475

[4] January CT(2004)Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system Circulation 109 1472-32

[5] Wann LS(2013)Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a high-volume centre with the use of intracardiac echocardiography EP Eur 15 24-874

[6] Alpert JS(2007)Remote magnetic navigation J Am Coll Cardiol 50 868-505

[7] Calkins H(2012)Long-term efficacy of single procedure remote magnetic catheter navigation for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23 499-560

[8] Cigarroa JE(2003)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 557-S16

[9] Cleveland JC(2016)Safety and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using magnetic navigation versus manual conventional ablation: a propensity-score analysis J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27 S11-43

[10] Choi MS(2011)Remote magnetic versus manual catheters: evaluation of ablation effect in atrial fibrillation by myocardial marker levels J Interv Card Electrophysiol 32 37-495