Determinants of health expenditure growth of the OECD countries: Jackknife resampling plan estimates

被引:41
作者
Okunade A.A. [1 ]
Karakus M.C. [2 ]
Okeke C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Rm. 450BB (The FCoBE), Univ. Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, U.
[2] Dept. of Hlth. Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
[3] College of Southern Nevada, Dept. of Econ. and Regional Studies, Las Vegas, NV 89146-1164, USA
关键词
Box-Cox transformation model; health policy; jackknife resampling methods; new growth theory; OECD health expenditure; panel data estimates;
D O I
10.1023/B:HCMS.0000039380.42784.20
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the lack of internal consistency across unit root and cointegration test methods for short time-series data, past research findings conflict on whether the OECD health expenditure data are stationary. Stationarity reasonably guarantees that the estimated OLS relationship is nonspurious. This paper departs from past investigations that applied asymptotic statistical tests of unit root to insufficient time-series lengths. Instead, data were calibrated in annual growth rates, in 5-year (1968-72, ..., 1993-97) partitions, for maximum likelihood estimation using flexible Box-Cox transformations model and bias-reducing jackknife resampling plan for data expansion. The drivers of OECD health care spending growth are economic and institutional. Findings from the growth convergence theory affirm that health care expenditure growth accords with conditional β convergence. Statistical significance and optimal functional form models are not unique across the growth period models. Our findings exemplify the benefits of jackknife resampling plan for short data series, and caution researchers against imposing faulty functional forms and applying asymptotic statistical methods to short time-series regressions. Policy implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Amemiya T., Advanced Econometrics, (1985)
[2]  
Atkinson A.C., Plots, Transformations and Regression. An Introduction to Graphical Methods of Diagnostic Regression Analysis, 1, (1985)
[3]  
Atkinson S.E., Wilson P.W., The bias of bootstrapped versus conventional standard errors in the general linear and SUR models, Econometric Theory, 8, pp. 258-275, (1992)
[4]  
Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X., Economic Growth, (1995)
[5]  
Barros P.P., The black box of health care expenditure growth determinants, Health Economics, 7, pp. 533-544, (1998)
[6]  
Baumol W.J., Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the long run data show, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 1072-1085, (1986)
[7]  
Brock W.A., Durlauf S.N., Growth empirics and reality, World Bank Economic Review, 15, pp. 229-272, (2001)
[8]  
Box G.E.P., Cox D.R., An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 26, pp. 211-243, (1964)
[9]  
Butler R., Rothman E.D., Predictive intervals based on reuse of the sample, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Theory and Methods Section, 75, pp. 881-889, (1980)
[10]  
Carroll R.J., Ruppert D., Transformations and Weighting in Regression Analysis, (1988)