Zooplankton biomass in tropical reservoirs in southern Brazil

被引:0
作者
Claudia Costa Bonecker
Mariza Yuri Nagae
Martin Cesar Maria Bletller
Luiz Felipe Machado Velho
Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha
机构
[1] Universidade Estadual de Maringá–Núcleo de Pesquisa em Limnologia,
[2] Ictiologia e Aqüicultura (Nupelia) / Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais,undefined
来源
Hydrobiologia | 2007年 / 579卷
关键词
Zooplankton; Biomass; Reservoir; Brazil;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to test the hypothesis that zooplankton biomass distribution (total and taxonomic groups) was influenced by the nutrient concentration and primary productivity distribution in three tropical reservoirs, subsurface samples were taken in the fluvial, transitional and lacustrine regions of three reservoirs (oligotrophic, mesotrophic and eutrophic) in southern Brazil (Paraná State) in March and September 2002. Zooplankton biomass ranged from 0.04 to 264.47 mg DW m−3. Higher biomass values were observed for cladocerans (73.60%; 0.01–259.86 mg DW m−3), followed by copepods (22.05%; 0.01–69.69 mg DW m−3) and rotifers (4.35%; 0.01–11.52 mg DW m−3). In general, the total zooplankton, rotifer, cladoceran and copepod biomass, and chlorophyll-a and total nutrient concentrations showed a similar longitudinal distribution within the reservoirs. Total zooplankton, rotifer and cladoceran biomass were related to the chlorophyll-a concentration, and zooplankton biomass was related to the total phosphorus distribution. This may have been due to the significant multicolinearity between the chlorophyll-a and total phosphorus concentrations. Cyanobacteria influenced the taxonomic group biomass results by interfering with the filter feeding in larger zooplankton species, which favoured the dominance of smaller species. As regards the longitudinal distribution of copepod biomass, cyanobacteria biomass determined the displacement of the microcrustaceans to the fluvial region of Iraí Reservoir. Our results supported the hypothesis formulated and the primary productivity was the major predictor of the zooplankton biomass distribution in the reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ahrens M. A.(1991)Patterns and limitations in limnoplankton size spectra Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48 1967-1978
[2]  
Peter R. H.(2004)Comparison of pelagic food webs in lakes along a trophic gradient and with seasonal aspects: influence of resource and predation Journal of Plankton Research 26 697-709
[3]  
Auer B.(2002)Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube River floodplain system: effects of hydrology Freshwater Biology 47 473-482
[4]  
Elzer U.(1991)Protozoan control of bacterial abundances in freshwater Limnology and Oceanography 39 139-147
[5]  
Arndt H.(1976)A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies Norwegian Journal of Zoology 24 419-456
[6]  
Baranyi C.(1993)Potential role of fish predation and natural population of zooplankton in structuring a plankton community in eutrophic lake water Limnology and Oceanography 38 561-573
[7]  
Hein T.(2005)Zooplankton community structure, micro-zooplankton grazing impact, and seston energy content in the St. Johns river system, Florida as influenced by the toxic caynobacterium Hydrobiologia 537 89-97
[8]  
Holarek C.(1989)Biomass (dry weight and carbon content) of plankton Crustacea from Broa reservoir (São Carlos, SP, Brazil) and its fluctuation across one year Hydrobiologia 179 229-236
[9]  
Keckeis S.(1981)The relative importance of protozoans, rotifers and crustaceans in a freshwater zooplankton community Limnology and Oceanography 26 822-830
[10]  
Schiemer F.(1986)An empirical analysis of zooplankton community size structure across lake trophic gradients Limnology and Oceanography 31 45-55