Language proficiency, sociolinguistic factors and inhibitory control among bilinguals

被引:1
作者
Nithin Thanissery
Priyanka Parihar
Bhoomika Rastogi Kar
机构
[1] University of Allahabad,Centre of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences
来源
Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science | 2020年 / 4卷
关键词
Bilingualism; Inhibitory control; Domain general cognitive control; L1/L2 proficiency; Language use; Socio-linguistic factors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bilingualism interacts with cognitive control mechanisms, particularly inhibitory control. It is believed that language proficiency as a measure of the degree of bilingualism may influence inhibitory control. However, this interaction is modulated by sociolinguistic factors associated with bilingual experience. We examined the relationship between language proficiency and inhibitory control and the influence of sociolinguistic factors by comparing high and low proficient Hindi–English bilinguals, and by using a correlational design. A standard go/no-go task with varying proportions of go and no-go trials was used. Study-1 showed that age of acquisition, language use in formal/informal setting, and bilingual switching influenced the interaction between L2 proficiency and inhibitory control. In general, high proficient bilinguals were better at regulating inhibitory control when the demand on inhibition was high compared to that of low proficient bilinguals. Study-2 showed that contextual switching and setting-based use of L2 predicted inhibitory control in a high monitoring condition while use of L1 predicted inhibitory control irrespective of inhibitory demands. However, contextual switching strengthened the interaction between L2 proficiency and inhibitory control whereas use of L1 moderated the relationship between L1 proficiency and inhibitory control. We did not find a significant effect of non-language variables such as fluid intelligence, socioeconomic status, and participation in skilled activities on the relationship between language proficiency and inhibitory control. We emphasize on the role of both L1 and L2 proficiency and the use of a correlational design to investigate the relationship between bilingualism and inhibitory control.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 241
页数:24
相关论文
共 167 条
  • [1] Barac R(2012)Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education Child Development 83 413-422
  • [2] Bialystok E(2016)Behavioral and electrophysiological differences in executive control between monolingual and bilingual children Child Development 87 1277-1290
  • [3] Barac R(2016)The signal and the noise: Finding the pattern in human behavior Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6 517-534
  • [4] Moreno S(2012)Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control Cognition 122 67-73
  • [5] Bialystok E(2004)Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task Psychology and Aging 19 290-531
  • [6] Bialystok E(2010)Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children Bilingualism (Cambridge, England) 13 525-500
  • [7] Bialystok E(2009)Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures Cognition 112 494-1126
  • [8] Barac R(2018)Ecological validity in bilingualism research and the bilingual advantage Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22 1117-567
  • [9] Bialystok E(2013)Cognitive control and parallel language activation during word recognition in bilinguals Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25 547-1182
  • [10] Craik FI(2002)Inhibition, response mode and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study Clinical Neurophysiology 113 1172-208