Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task

被引:0
作者
Corentin Gonthier
Todd S. Braver
Julie M. Bugg
机构
[1] Université Savoie Mont Blanc,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
[2] LPNC UMR CNRS 5105,undefined
[3] Washington University in Saint Louis,undefined
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2016年 / 44卷
关键词
Cognitive control; Dual Mechanisms of Control (DMC); Stroop interference; List-wide proportion congruency; Item-specific proportion congruency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Dual Mechanisms of Control framework posits the existence of two distinct control mechanisms, proactive and reactive, which may operate independently. However, this independence has been difficult to study with most experimental paradigms. The Stroop task may provide a useful way of assessing the independence of control mechanisms because the task elicits two types of proportion congruency effects, list-wide and item-specific, thought to reflect proactive and reactive control respectively. The present research tested whether these two proportion congruency effects can be used to dissociate proactive and reactive control. In 2 separate participant samples, we demonstrate that list-wide and item-specific proportion congruency effects are stable, exist in the same participants, and appear in different task conditions. Moreover, we identify two distinct behavioral signatures, the congruency cost and the transfer cost, which doubly dissociate the two effects. Together, the results are consistent with the view that proactive and reactive control reflect independent mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 788
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]  
Robidoux S(2013)Converging evidence for control of color–word Stroop interference at the item level Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39 433-859
[12]  
Risko EF(2011)Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance 37 844-1494
[13]  
Besner D(2008)Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task Memory & Cognition 36 1484-1606
[14]  
Braver TS(2011)Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance 37 1595-860
[15]  
Braver TS(2011)The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37 851-644
[16]  
Paxton JL(2003)Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 638-70
[17]  
Locke HS(2003)Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 47-234
[18]  
Barch DM(1994)Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 219-174
[19]  
Bugg JM(1979)When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task Memory & Cognition 7 166-700
[20]  
Bugg JM(1982)Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie 36 684-203