Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task

被引:0
作者
Corentin Gonthier
Todd S. Braver
Julie M. Bugg
机构
[1] Université Savoie Mont Blanc,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
[2] LPNC UMR CNRS 5105,undefined
[3] Washington University in Saint Louis,undefined
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2016年 / 44卷
关键词
Cognitive control; Dual Mechanisms of Control (DMC); Stroop interference; List-wide proportion congruency; Item-specific proportion congruency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Dual Mechanisms of Control framework posits the existence of two distinct control mechanisms, proactive and reactive, which may operate independently. However, this independence has been difficult to study with most experimental paradigms. The Stroop task may provide a useful way of assessing the independence of control mechanisms because the task elicits two types of proportion congruency effects, list-wide and item-specific, thought to reflect proactive and reactive control respectively. The present research tested whether these two proportion congruency effects can be used to dissociate proactive and reactive control. In 2 separate participant samples, we demonstrate that list-wide and item-specific proportion congruency effects are stable, exist in the same participants, and appear in different task conditions. Moreover, we identify two distinct behavioral signatures, the congruency cost and the transfer cost, which doubly dissociate the two effects. Together, the results are consistent with the view that proactive and reactive control reflect independent mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 788
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Barch DM(2001)Selective deficits in prefrontal cortex function in medication-naive patients with schizophrenia Archives of General Psychiatry 58 280-288
[2]  
Carter CS(2010)Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22 2758-2767
[3]  
Braver TS(2007)Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model Psychological Review 114 1076-1086
[4]  
Sabb FW(2012)The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 106-113
[5]  
MacDonald A(2009)Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 7351-7356
[6]  
Noll DC(2012)Dissociating levels of cognitive control: The case of Stroop interference Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 302-309
[7]  
Cohen JD(2014)Conflict-triggered top-down control: Default mode, last resort, or no such thing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 567-587
[8]  
Blais C(2014)Evidence for the sparing of reactive cognitive control with age Psychology and Aging 29 115-127
[9]  
Bunge S(2011)List-wide control is not entirely elusive: Evidence from picture-word Stroop Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18 930-936
[10]  
Blais C(2012)In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects Frontiers in Psychology 3 367-449