Case law on standard essential patents in Europe

被引：0

作者：

Bonadio E. ^{[1
]}

Tanwar A. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] City, University of London, London

[2] University School of Law and Legal Studies, New Delhi

来源：

ERA Forum | 2021年 / 22卷 / 4期

关键词：

Competition; Enforcement; Patents; Standardisation;

D O I：

10.1007/s12027-021-00690-6

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In Europe disputes over SEPs are frequently litigated. In Huawei v ZTE, the CJEU gave a landmark judgement where it established guidelines to balance the interests of SEP owners and those of implementers. In this paper we will cover that case as well as other important SEP-related decisions from courts in the UK, Germany, France, Netherland and Italy. © 2021, The Author(s).

引用

页码：601 / 618

页数：17

共 17 条

[1]

Bharadwaj A., Verma D., Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up: implication of Huawei/ZTE framework (CJEU 2015) in Europe, The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 17, (2018)

[2]

Bonadio E., McDonagh L., Car wars: How Nokia could find itself at centre of EU investigation over technology patents, (2020)

[3]

Bonadio E., McDonagh L., Networked Technologies in The Car Industry, Standard Essential Patents and Refusal to License: The CJEU Will Soon Shed Light in Nokia V Daimler, (2020)

[4]

Klos M., Nokia and Daimler Settle All Global Litigation in Connected Cars Dispute, (2021)

[5]

Heard C., Morgan G., Wong E., TQ Delta V Zyxel – Court of Appeal Cancels the RAND Trial as Zyxel No Longer a ‘willing licensee’, (2019)

[6]

(2020)

[7]

Sherliker T., Court of Appeal Cancels RAND Trial in Zyxel V TQ Delta, (2019)

[8]

Raynor M., Technical Primers Where Infringement / Essentiality / Equivalents Case Involves Complex Technology – Mitsubishi & Sisvel V Oneplus & Xiaomi [2021] EWHC 1639 (Pat), (2021)

[9]

Lambert J., Patents – Mitsubishi Electric Corporation V Oneplus Technology, (2021)

[10]

Cotter T., French Court Rejects Unfair Competition Claim Based on Patentee’s Compliance with Huawei V. ZTE, (2016)

← 1 2 →