The poetry of negligence

被引:0
作者
Wolcher L.E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Law, University of Washington, School of Law, Seattle, WA 98105
[2] School of Law, University of Washington, Seattle
关键词
Art; Beauty; Law; Legal rhetoric; Logos; Negligence; Poetry; Suffering; Truth;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016090019088
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Poetry and legal rhetoric are both forms of what the ancient Greeks called poiēsis: the art of the word. Tradition nonetheless assigns poetry to the realm of art and beauty, and legal rhetoric to the different realm of law and truth. The late William Matthews' poem "Negligence" transgresses the boundaries that we have erected between art and law, and beauty and truth. The poem presents a well-crafted piece of legal rhetoric in the form of art. This essay draws out the implications of Matthews' transgression, and suggests that in the end poetry and law have a lot in common: both are forms of manipulation by means of words. The essay develops this connection in order to join with Emmanuel Levinas in calling for a "breakup in the omnipotence of the logos." © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 197
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Townsend M., Cardozo's Allegheny College Opinion: A Case Study in Law as an Art, Houston Law Review, 33, 4, pp. 1103-1153, (1996)
[2]  
Heidegger M., Nietzsche, 1, (1991)
[3]  
Stevens W., A Note on Poetry, Wallace Stevens: Collected Poetry and Prose, (1997)
[4]  
Nietzsche F., The Will to Power, pp. 419-453, (1968)
[5]  
Nietzsche F., The Will to Power
[6]  
Healy N., Sharpe D., Cases and Materials on Admiralty, 160, (1999)
[7]  
Plato, The Republic, pp. 360-397
[8]  
Frank J., Law and the Modern Mind, (1970)
[9]  
Marcuse H., One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, (1964)
[10]  
Stevens W., The Irrational Element in Poetry, pp. 781-792