The transposed-word effect does not require parallel word processing: Failure to notice transpositions with serial presentation of words

被引:0
作者
Kuan-Jung Huang
Adrian Staub
机构
[1] University of Massachusetts Amherst,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
Reading; Transposed-word effect; Serial word processing; Parallel word processing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Readers sometimes fail to notice word transposition errors, reporting a sentence with two transposed words to be grammatical (the transposed-word effect). It has been suggested that this effect implicates parallel word processing during sentence reading. The current study directly assessed the role of parallel word processing in failure to notice word transposition errors, by comparing error detection under normal sentence presentation conditions and when words are presented serially at 250 ms/word. Extending recent results obtained with serial presentation of Chinese sentences (Liu, Li, Cutter, Paterson, & Wang, Cognition 218: 104922, 2022), in Experiment 1 we found a transposed-word effect with serial presentation of English sentences. In Experiment 2, we replicated this finding with task instructions that allowed responding at any time during the presentation of the sentence; this result indicates that the transposed-word effect that appears with serial word presentation is not due to a late process of reconstruction of short-term memory. Thus, parallel word processing is not necessary for a transposed-word effect in English. Like Liu et al. (2022), we did find that the transposed-word effect was statistically larger with parallel presentation than with serial presentation; we consider several explanations as to why this is so.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 400
页数:7
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Allen RJ(2018)Exploring the sentence advantage in working memory: Insights from serial recall and recognition Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 2571-2585
[2]  
Hitch GJ(2013)Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal Journal of Memory and Language 68 255-278
[3]  
Baddeley AD(2005)Regularization in short-term memory for serial order Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 351-358
[4]  
Barr DJ(2019)How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate Journal of Memory and Language 109 164-203
[5]  
Levy R(2003)The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences Cognitive Psychology 47 429-442
[6]  
Scheepers C(2022)Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production Nature Human Behaviour 6 8051-8056
[7]  
Tily HJ(2013)Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 81-102
[8]  
Botvinick M(2021)Contextual constraint and lexical competition: Revisiting biased misperception during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 47 98-122
[9]  
Bylsma LM(2021)Using eye tracking to investigate failure to notice word transpositions in reading Cognition 216 1922-1929
[10]  
Brysbaert M(2021)Why do readers fail to notice word transpositions, omissions, and repetitions? A review of recent evidence and theory Lang & Ling Compass 15 195-203