Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK

被引:0
作者
Heejung Chung
机构
[1] University of Kent,School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research (SSPSSR), Faculty of Social Sciences
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2020年 / 151卷
关键词
Flexible working; Flexibility stigma; Career consequences; UK; Gender inequality; Gender; Parental status;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the prevalence and the gender differences in the perceptions and experiences of flexibility stigma—i.e., the belief that workers who use flexible working arrangements for care purposes are less productive and less committed to the workplace. This is done by using the 4th wave of the Work-Life Balance Survey conducted in 2011 in the UK. The results show that 35% of all workers agree to the statement that those who work flexibly generate more work for others, and 32% believe that those who work flexibly have lower chances for promotion. Although at first glance, men are more likely to agree to both, once other factors are controlled for, women especially mothers are more likely to agree to the latter statement. Similarly, men are more likely to say they experienced negative outcomes due to co-workers working flexibly, while again mothers are more likely to say they experienced negative career consequences due to their own flexible working. The use of working time reducing arrangements, such as part-time, is a major reason why people experience negative career outcomes, and can partially explain why mothers are more likely to suffer from such outcomes when working flexibly. However, this relationship could be reverse, namely, the stigma towards part-time workers may be due to negative perceptions society hold towards mothers’ commitment to work and their productivity. In sum, this paper shows that flexibility stigma is gendered, in that men are more likely to discriminate against flexible workers, while women, especially mothers, are more likely to suffer from such discrimination.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 545
页数:24
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Beauregard TA(2009)Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance Human Resource Management Review 19 9-22
[2]  
Henry LC(2012)Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces 91 55-63
[3]  
Bianchi SM(2013)Ask and ye shall receive? The dynamics of employer-provided flexible work options and the need for public policy Journal of Social Issues 69 367-388
[4]  
Sayer LC(2001)The wage penalty for motherhood American Sociological Review 66 204-225
[5]  
Milkie MA(2014)Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers Work and Occupations 41 86-110
[6]  
Robinson JP(2018)‘Women’s work penalty’ in the access to flexible working arrangements across Europe European Journal of Industrial Relations 52 491-507
[7]  
Brescoll VL(2018)Dualization and the access to occupational family-friendly working-time arrangements across Europe Social Policy & Administration 19 49-68
[8]  
Glass J(2017)European parents’ attitudes towards public childcare provision: the role of current provisions, interests and ideologies European Societies 71 47-72
[9]  
Sedlovskaya A(2018)Flexible working and unpaid overtime in the UK: The role of gender, parental and occupational status Social Indicators Research 69 279-302
[10]  
Budig MJ(2018)Women’s employment patterns after childbirth and the perceived access to and use of flexitime and teleworking Human Relations 118 F52-F76