Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: Systemic Therapy Options

被引:0
作者
Zhubin Gahvari
Amanda Parkes
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center,
来源
Current Treatment Options in Oncology | 2020年 / 21卷
关键词
Liposarcoma; Dedifferentiated liposarcoma; Chemotherapy; CDK4; MDM2; Metastatic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over the last several years, the systemic treatment landscape for dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) has notably expanded. Historically, systemic therapy options have been limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, including doxorubicin, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, and docetaxel, that were shown to have efficacy in unselected populations of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. More recently, however, there have been phase II and III trials establishing clinical benefit of the cytotoxic agents trabectedin and eribulin along with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib in patients with advanced liposarcoma and DDLPS. Additionally, there are several investigational targeted therapies that have incorporated advances in the understanding of DDLPS disease biology, exploiting the fact that nearly all such tumors include highly amplified expression of MDM2 and CDK4. Recent clinical trials have supported the benefit of the CDK4 inhibitor abemaciclib and the nuclear export inhibitor selinexor and support continued development of anti-MDM2 therapies, with particular attention to the bone marrow toxicity and resultant thrombocytopenia that has thus far limited their use. In contrast, the checkpoint inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab remain of questionable benefit, although these immunotherapy drugs may have a role when combined with other therapeutic agents. Ongoing phase III trials will clarify the role of these novel agents. Future directions include directly comparing current standard-of-care options and newer therapies, developing synergistic combinations of novel agents, and evaluating their role in patients with localized DDLPS.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 453 条
[11]  
Silberstein P(2014)Predictors of outcomes in patients with primary retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma undergoing surgery J Am Coll Surg 218 206-217
[12]  
Henricks WH(2015)Accuracy of preoperative percutaneous biopsy for the diagnosis of retroperitoneal liposarcoma subtypes Ann Surg Oncol 22 1068-1072
[13]  
Chu YC(2007)Gene expression profiling of liposarcoma identifies distinct biological types/subtypes and potential therapeutic targets in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma Cancer Res 67 6626-6636
[14]  
Goldblum JR(2017)Comprehensive and integrated genomic characterization of adult soft tissue sarcomas Cell 171 950-965
[15]  
Weiss SW(2008)HMGA2 is the partner of MDM2 in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas whereas CDK4 belongs to a distinct inconsistent amplicon Int J Cancer 122 2233-2241
[16]  
Weiss SW(2005)Surgical management of primary and recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma Br J Surg 92 246-252
[17]  
Rao VK(2019)Degree of MDM2 amplification affects clinical outcomes in dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Oncologist 24 989-996
[18]  
McCormick D(2017)High amplification levels of MDM2 and CDK4 correlate with poor outcome in patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a cytogenomic microarray analysis of 47 cases Cancer Genet 218-219 69-80
[19]  
Mentzel T(2011)Clinical and molecular approaches to well differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma Curr Opin Oncol 23 373-378
[20]  
Beham A(2014)Preoperative chemo-radiation therapy for localised retroperitoneal sarcoma: a phase I-II study from the Italian sarcoma group Eur J Cancer 50 784-792