Nuclear field shift effects on stable isotope fractionation: a review

被引:21
作者
Yang S. [1 ,2 ]
Liu Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
关键词
Isotope fractionation; Mass-dependent effect; Mass-independent fractionation; Nuclear field shift effect; Nuclear shape effect; Nuclear volume effect;
D O I
10.1007/s11631-016-0109-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An anomalous isotope effect exists in many heavy element isotope systems (e.g., Sr, Gd, Zn, U). This effect used to be called the “odd–even isotope effect” because the odd mass number isotopes behave differently from the even mass number isotopes. This mass-independent isotope fractionation driving force, which originates from the difference in the ground-state electronic energies caused by differences in nuclear size and shape, is currently denoted as the nuclear field shift effect (NFSE). It is found that the NFSE can drive isotope fractionation of some heavy elements (e.g., Hg, Tl, U) to an astonishing degree, far more than the magnitude caused by the conventional mass-dependent effect (MDE). For light elements, the MDE is the dominant factor in isotope fractionation, while the NFSE is neglectable. Furthermore, the MDE and the NFSE both decrease as temperatures increase, though at different rates. The MDE decreases rapidly with a factor of 1/T2, while the NFSE decreases slowly with a factor of 1/T. As a result, even at high temperatures, the NFSE is still significant for many heavy element isotope systems. In this review paper, we begin with an introduction of the basic concept of the NSFE, including its history and recent progress, and follow with the potential implications of the inclusion of the NFSE into the kinetic isotope fractionation effect (KIE) and heavy isotope geochronology. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 239
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Abe M., Suzuki T., Fujii Y., Hada M., An ab initio study based on a finite nucleus model for isotope fractionation in the U(III)–U(IV) exchange reaction system, J Chem Phys, 128, pp. 144309-1-144309-6, (2008)
  • [2] Abe M., Suzuki T., Fujii Y., Hada M., Hirao K., An ab initio molecular orbital study of the nuclear volume effects in uranium isotope fractionations, J Chem Phys, 129, pp. 164309-1-164309-7, (2008)
  • [3] Abe M., Suzuki T., Fujii Y., Hada M., Hirao K., Ligand effect on uranium isotope fractionations caused by nuclear volume effects: An ab initio relativistic molecular orbital study, J Chem Phys, 133, pp. 044309-1-044309-5, (2010)
  • [4] Angeli I., A consistent set of nuclear rms charge radii: properties of the radius surface R (N, Z), Atom Data Nucl Data Tables, 87, pp. 185-206, (2004)
  • [5] Aufmuth P., Heilig K., Steudel A., Changes in mean-square nuclear charge radii from optical isotope shifts, Atom Data Nucl Data Tables, 37, pp. 455-490, (1987)
  • [6] Basu A., Sanford R.A., Johnson T.H., Lundstrom C.C., LOffler F.E., Uranium isotopic fractionation factors during U(VI) reduction by bacterial isolates, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 136, pp. 100-113, (2014)
  • [7] Bergquist B.A., Blum J.D., Mass-dependent and –independent fractionation of Hg isotopes by photoreduction in aquatic systems, Science, 318, pp. 417-419, (2007)
  • [8] Bigeleisen J., Nuclear size and shape effects in chemical reaction. Isotope chemistry of the heavy elements, J Am Chem Soc, 118, pp. 3676-3680, (1996)
  • [9] Bigeleisen J., Second-order correction to the Bigeleisen–Mayer equation due to the nuclear field shift, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, pp. 4809-4908, (1998)
  • [10] Bigeleisen J., Mayer M.G., Calculation of equilibrium constants for isotopic exchange reactions, J Chem Phys, 15, pp. 261-267, (1947)