Water use governance in a temperate region: Implications for agricultural climate change adaptation in the Northeastern United States

被引:0
作者
Rachel E. Schattman
Meredith T. Niles
Hannah M. Aitken
机构
[1] University of Maine,School of Food and Agriculture
[2] University of Vermont,Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences
来源
Ambio | 2021年 / 50卷
关键词
Agriculture; Climate change; Groundwater; Regulation; Surface water;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Climate change and access to water are interrelated concerns for agriculture and other sectors, even in temperate regions. Governance approaches and regulatory frameworks determine who has access to water, for what purpose, and when. In the northeastern United States, water governance has historically been conducted by states through a combination of statutory guidance and common law. However, it is unclear what effect if current governance approaches will be sufficient for achieving resource conservation and equitable allocation in a changing climate. To provide insight into these issues, we conducted the first review of freshwater governance in the 12 states that comprise the U.S. Northeast. Specifically, we examine their heterogeneous approaches to surface and groundwater use, permitting and reporting, and scarcity provisions. Using agriculture as the sector of focus, we show through narrative review and quantitative analysis that change in the proportion of cropland that is irrigated in each state does not differ based on governance approach. We also suggest that future decades may bring regulatory shifts relevant to agriculture, changes in enforcement, increased competition between agriculture and other users, and greater potential competition between states for water resources. This case study raises the question: how should we prepare for the time when competition for, or degradation of, a resource surpasses the ability of existing governance mechanisms to ensure conservation and equitable distribution?
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 955
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Abrams RH(1990)Water allocation by comprehensive permit systems in the east: Considering a move away from orthodoxy Virginia Environmental Law Journal 9 255-285
[2]  
Adler RW(2010)Climate change and the hegemony of state water law Stanford Environmental Law Journal 29 1-61
[3]  
Armitage D(2015)Science–policy processes for transboundary water governance Ambio 44 353-366
[4]  
de Loë RC(1978)Water use permits in a Riparian state: Problems and proposals Kentucky Law Review 66 191-265
[5]  
Morris M(1983)Water rights legislation in the east: A program for reform William and Mary Law Review 24 547-590
[6]  
Edwards TWD(2014)Water governance challenges in New Mexico’s middle Rio Grande valley: A resilience assessment natural resources & environmental law edition Idaho Law Review 51 195-228
[7]  
Gerlak AK(2014)Craig and Ruhl’s model adaptive management procedures act: Proposed amendments natural resources & environmental law edition Idaho Law Review 51 257-278
[8]  
Hall RI(2019)Reassessing the projections of the World Water Development Report NPJ Clean Water 2 15-39
[9]  
Huitema D(2019)Adaptation to future water shortages in the United States caused by population growth and climate change Earth’s Future 95 1-66
[10]  
Ison R(2011)The evolution of Riparianism in the United States Marquette Law Review 35 1-1912