Cultural Heritage Accessibility in the Digital Era and the Greek Legal Framework

被引:0
作者
Marina Markellou
机构
[1] University of Groningen,Faculty of Law
来源
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique | 2023年 / 36卷
关键词
Greek cultural heritage law; Digitisation; Access; Reuse; Digital cultural content; Cultural heritage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
New technologies provide great opportunities for cultural heritage to become more widely accessible and for cultural experience to be more meaningful. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the strengths and vulnerabilities of the cultural heritage sector and the need to accelerate its digital transformation to make the most of the opportunities it provides. The Commission Recommendation on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation (2011/711/EU) concluded that there is an urgent need to protect and preserve European cultural heritage, and, in particular, endangered cultural heritage is still present. However, the diversity of legal approaches to cultural heritage by the Member States discourages the creation of a common European data space for cultural heritage as the European Commission recently proclaimed. In Greece, there have been significant efforts in recent decades to digitise and digitally preserve cultural heritage goods. However, the attention was not drew upon the accessibility and reuse of the digitized cultural heritage content. According to the relevant regulatory framework the existing rules on the use of digital technologies for the reproduction, use and preservation of cultural heritage content is obviously outdated. According to the paragraphs 4 and 5 of article 46 of the Greek Code for the protection of antiquities and cultural heritage in general (Law 4858/2021), a previous permission granted by the Ministry of Culture is required for the production, reproduction and dissemination to the public of impressions, copies or depictions of monuments belonging to the Public Sector, or immovable monuments that are located within archaeological sites and historical places or are isolated, or movable monuments that are kept in museums or public collections, in any way and by any means whatsoever, including Information Communication Technologies. Such permission is granted to natural or legal persons for a fee paid to the Hellenic Organization of Cultural Resources Development (HOCRED) upon the decision of the Minister of Culture, while the decision also specifies the temporal validity of the permission, the terms on which the permission is granted and the fee that must be paid. The production, reproduction and use of the aforementioned goods for other purposes, such as artistic, educational or scientific purposes, is again allowed for a fee paid to HOCRED, however, the fee can be waived upon the decision of the Minister of Culture. This Paper will examine the existing Greek legal framework and will attempt to propose an appropriate framework that will ensure open access to the digitized cultural heritage assets, enhance the recovery and transformation of the cultural heritage sector and support cultural heritage institutions in becoming more empowered and more resilient in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1945 / 1969
页数:24
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Voudouri Daphne(2010)Law and the Politics of the Past: Legal Protection of Cultural Heritage International Journal of Cultural Property 17 547-568
[2]  
Hamilakis Yannis(1996)Antiquities as Symbolic Capital in Modern Greek Society Antiquity 70 117-129
[3]  
Yalouri Eleana(2020)Digital Heritage Surrogates, Decolonization, and International Law: Restitution, Control and Creation of Value as Reparations and Emancipation Santarder Art and Culture Law Review 6 65-86
[4]  
Lixinski Lucas(2009)DCC&U: An Extended Digital Curation Lifecycle International Journal of Digital Curation 4 34-45
[5]  
Constantopoulos Panos(2010)Law and the Politics of the Past: Legal Protection of Cultural Heritage in Greece International Journal of Cultural Property 17 547-568
[6]  
Dallas Costis(2005)The Master's Tools v. The Master's House: Creative Commons v. Copyright Columbia Journal of Law and Arts 29 271-293
[7]  
Androutsopoulos Ion(2020)Revisiting Access to Cultural Heritage in the Public Domain: EU and International Developments IIC 51 823-855
[8]  
Angelis Stavros(2019)Responding to Open Access: How German Museums use Digital Content Museum and Society 17 193-209
[9]  
Deligiannakis Antonios(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Gavrilis Dimitris(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined