High Strain Rate Response of Rocks Under Dynamic Loading Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar

被引：39

作者：

Mishra S. ^{[1
]}

Meena H. ^{[1
]}

Parashar V. ^{[1
]}

Khetwal A. ^{[1
]}

Chakraborty T. ^{[1
]}

Matsagar V. ^{[1
]}

Chandel P. ^{[2
]}

Singh M. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi

[2] Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory (TBRL), Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Sector - 30, Chandigarh

来源：

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | 2018年 / 36卷 / 01期

关键词：

Dynamic increase factor; High strain rate; Metamorphic rock; Sedimentary rock; Split Hopkinson pressure bar;

D O I：

10.1007/s10706-017-0345-2

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In the present work, dynamic stress–strain response of five sedimentary and three metamorphic rocks from different regions of India, e.g. Kota sandstone, Dholpur sandstone, Kota limestone, Himalayan limestone, dolomite, quartzite, quartzitic gneiss and phyllite have been investigated through split Hopkinson pressure bar test at different strain rates. The dry density, specific gravity, static compressive strength and tensile strength values of the rocks have also been determined. Petrological studies of the rocks have been carried out through X-ray diffraction test and scanning electron microscope test. It is observed from the stress–strain response of the rocks that the peak stress increases with increasing strain rate. Dynamic increase factors for the strength of these rocks have been determined by comparing the dynamic and the static peak compressive stresses and correlation equations are proposed. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.

引用

页码：531 / 549

页数：18

共 46 条

[1]

Akram M., Bakar M.Z.A., Correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and point load index for salt-range rocks, Pak J Eng Appl Sci, 1, 50, pp. 1-8, (2007)

[2]

Alam M.S., Chakraborty T., Matsagar V., Rao K.S., Sharma P., Singh M., Characterization of Kota sandstone under different strain rates in uniaxial loading, Geotech Geol Eng, 33, 1, pp. 143-152, (2015)

[3]

Anuradha M.S., Chakraborty T., Matsagar V., Chandel P., Singh M., High Strain rate response of himalayan quartzitic gneiss by using split Hopkinson pressure bar. In: Rock dynamics: from research to engineering—2nd international conference on rock dynamics and applications, ROCDYN, 2016, pp. 93-98, (2016)

[4]

Standard practices for preparing rock core as cylindrical test specimens and verifying conformance to dimensional and shape tolerances, (2008)

[5]

Standard test method for determination of the point load strength index of rock and application to rock strength classifications, (2008)

[6]

Standard test methods for compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under varying states of stress and temperatures, (2014)

[7]

Practices for force verification of testing machines, (2016)

[8]

Blanton T.L., Effect of Strain Rates from 10<sup>−2</sup> to 10 sec<sup>−1</sup> in triaxial compression tests on three rocks, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 18, 1, pp. 47-62, (1981)

[9]

Chakraborty T., Mishra S., Loukus J., Halonen B., Bekkala B., Characterization of three himalayan rocks using a split hopkinson pressure bar, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 85, pp. 112-118, (2016)

[10]

Chen W., Ravichandran G., An experimental technique for imposing dynamic multiaxial-compression with mechanical confinement, Exp Mech, 36, pp. 155-158, (1996)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →