Development of Indicators for Family Well-Being in Malaysia

被引:0
作者
Noraini M. Noor
Anjli Doshi Gandhi
Ismahalil Ishak
Saodah Wok
机构
[1] International Islamic Universiy Malaysia,
[2] National Population and Family Development Board,undefined
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2014年 / 115卷
关键词
Indicators; Index; Family well-being; Malaysia; Satisfaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was carried out to develop a set of indicators for measuring and reporting the state of family well-being in Malaysia, and subsequently, to produce an Index of Family Well-Being. To build the set of indicators, domains of family well-being and relevant indicators were identified from past studies. Focus group discussions with families, professional groups and NGOs helped to refine the indicators prior to the main study. Using a stratified random sampling design, 2,808 households were identified (a parent and a child aged at least 13 years), making a total sample of 5,616 respondents. Results indicated ten key indicators that can predict family well-being—resiliency, safety, savings, healthy lifestyle, time with family, work-family balance, importance of religion, number of bedrooms at home, debt and child care—supporting the notion of family well-being being multi-dimensional and interconnected. On the basis of the results, a model of family well-being was hypothesized. This model was used to guide the development of the Index of Family Well-being. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out to determine the fit of the model to data. Five domains of family well-being were identified—family relationships, economic situation, health and safety, community relationship and religion/spirituality. The Index of Family Well-Being was calculated using the equal weighting strategy to each of these five domains. This index showed that the current family well-being of Malaysians is relatively high at 7.95 (SD = 1.38) on a 0–10 Likert response format. The findings suggest that family well-being is multifaceted, made up not only of the immediate family relationships and health and safety of its members, but include having adequate income to meet the demands of a minimum standard of living. Currently, the Index that is developed is only in the form of a numerical value reflecting the state of family well-being, but in future, it can be used to track changes in the family from time to time.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 318
页数:39
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Amin RM(2006)Values, social problems and balanced development in Malaysia Journal of Socio-Economics 35 151-163
  • [2] Yusof SA(1991)The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use Journal of Early Adolescence 11 56-95
  • [3] Haneef MS(2007)An index of child well-being in the European Union Social Indicators Research 80 133-177
  • [4] Baumrind D(2003)Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Well-being Index Social Indicators Research 64 159-190
  • [5] Bradshaw J(2006)Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revisions to the adaptation theory of well-being American Psychologist 61 305-314
  • [6] Hoelscher P(1999)Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychological Bulletin 125 276-302
  • [7] Richardson D(2006)Over our heads: Housing costs & Australian families Australian Quarterly 78 4-11
  • [8] Cummins RA(2000)The mixed blessings of material progress: Diminishing returns in the pursuit of happiness Journal of Happiness Studies 1 267-292
  • [9] Eckersley R(2004)Well-being in an adult Swedish population Social Indicators Research 74 313-325
  • [10] Pallant J(2009)Measuring human well-being in Pakistan: Objective versus subjective indicators European Journal of Social Science 9 517-532