Tensions between meritocracy and democracy? A reply to the diploma democracy thesis

被引:0
作者
Joost Waterborg
Kirsten Lucas
Gert-Jan Lindeboom
机构
[1] Universiteit Leiden,Department of Political Science
来源
Acta Politica | 2012年 / 47卷
关键词
diploma democracy; education; political participation; representation; Dutch politics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bovens and Wille argue that the Netherlands has become a diploma democracy in which the higher educated dominate all venues of political participation and thus shape policy in their favor. Bovens and Wille see disparities between the political priorities and preferences of the higher and lower educated and argue that the lower levels of participation of the less educated lead to their underrepresentation and subsequent disaffection. In this reply, it is argued that the empirical analysis that supports Bovens and Wille's thesis does not warrant such a conclusion. A replication of Bovens and Wille's analysis shows that the gap between higher and lower educated is non-existent and that the differences in political behavior cannot simply be attributed to education.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Bovens M(2010)The education gap in participation and its political consequences Acta Politica 45 393-422
  • [2] Wille A(1989)A directional theory of issue voting American Political Science Review 83 93-121
  • [3] Rabinowitz G(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [4] MacDonald SE(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined